Terabit Hosting Canada Montreal Intel Xeon E5-2670 Powerful Cloud Server Test and Review
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfbea/cfbea50fc82318d7b7f211eaa06a75157360d9bc" alt="Terabit Hosting Canada Montreal Intel Xeon E5-2670 Powerful Cloud Server Test and Review"
We recently tested Terabit Hosting‘s Montreal Powerful Cloud Server (Basic plan). This server uses an Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 processor, and we tested it with 1 CPU core, 2GB of RAM, and a 25GB SSD. It also boasts a 1 Gbps internet connection and 5TB of monthly traffic, hosted in Canada. Our initial checks confirmed the server runs Debian 11 and utilizes KVM virtualization with a full cone NAT. We also saw that important features like AES-NI and VM-x/AMD-V are enabled, which is good for performance and security.
About Terabit Hosting
Terabit.io is a premium hosting provider that offers a range of high-performance solutions tailored to meet diverse needs. Whether running a business, managing a gaming community, or seeking personal hosting services, Terabit.io provides a reliable and secure platform. Their global network boasts over 6Tbps DDoS mitigation capacity, ensuring uninterrupted performance and security.
Terabit.io’s infrastructure is built with state-of-the-art hardware, including AMD Ryzen and EPYC processors, DDR5 RAM, and NVMe storage. They offer various hosting options, such as VPS, dedicated servers, and game servers, all designed to deliver low latency and high-speed performance.
One of Terabit.io’s standout features is its exceptional customer support. They provide 24/7 real-time support through live chat, tickets, and Discord, ensuring that users receive prompt assistance whenever needed. Additionally, they offer flexible plans and customizable server configurations to cater to specific requirements.
Pricing
Price | Package | Cores | Memory | Storage | Stock | Order |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$4.99 /month | Basic | 1 vCore | 2 GB | 25 GB | 10 | ORDER NOW |
$8.99 /month | Standard | 2 vCores | 6 GB | 60 GB6 | 6 | ORDER NOW |
$12.99 /month | Ultimate | 4 vCores | 16 GB | 80 GB | 4 | ORDER NOW |
$16.99 /month | Pro | 8 vCores | 24 GB | 160 GB | 5 | ORDER NOW |
$20.99 /month | Enterprise | 12 vCores | 32 GB | 200 GB | 5 | ORDER NOW |
Official Website: https://Terabit.io
Coupon
The merchant did not provide
Basic Information
Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v3 @ 2.30GHz
CPU Numbers : 1
CPU Frequency : 2299.988 MHz
CPU Cache : L1: 64.00 KB / L2: 256.00 KB / L3: 30.00 MB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 401.52 MiB / 1.90 GiB
Swap : [ no swap partition or swap file detected ]
Disk Space : 2.29 GiB / 24.87 GiB
Boot Disk : /dev/vda3
Uptime : 0 days, 15 hour 44 min
Loads : 0.78, 0.23, 0.07
OS Release : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) (x86_64)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel Version : 5.10.0-20-amd64
TCP Acceleration : bbr
VM Type : KVM
NAT Type : Full Cone
IPV4 ASN : AS1002 Bytefilter LLC
IPV4 Location : Toronto / Ontario / CA
GB6 Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 626
Multi Core | 683
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/10544215
YABS completed in 15 min 59 sec
RAM Read/Write Tests
----------------------------Memory-Test---------------------------------
-> Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
Single Read Test: 15945.95 MB/s
Single Write Test: 10399.42 MB/s
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: read
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 41481570 (4147102.21 per second)
40509.35 MiB transferred (4049.90 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0003s
total number of events: 41481570
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 12.68
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 3293.67
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 41481570.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 3.2937/0.00
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: write
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 33570801 (3356280.47 per second)
32783.99 MiB transferred (3277.62 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0002s
total number of events: 33570801
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 8.97
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 4685.67
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 33570801.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 4.6857/0.00
Disk Read/Write Tests
------------------------Disk-dd-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
-> Disk test in progress (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode)
Block Size Write Test Read Test
100MB-4K Block 14.0 MB/s (3413 IOPS, 7.50s) 20.8 MB/s (5076 IOPS, 5.04s)
1GB-1M Block 211 MB/s (201 IOPS, 4.98s) 134 MB/s (128 IOPS, 7.81s)
-----------------------Disk-fio-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 16.69 MB/s (4.1k) | 31.88 MB/s (498)
Write | 16.69 MB/s (4.1k) | 32.20 MB/s (503)
Total | 33.39 MB/s (8.3k) | 64.08 MB/s (1.0k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 25.83 MB/s (50) | 32.07 MB/s (31)
Write | 27.89 MB/s (54) | 34.54 MB/s (33)
Total | 53.73 MB/s (104) | 66.62 MB/s (64)
Iperf3 Network Tests
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | busy | 630 Mbits/sec | 81.2 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 1.64 Gbits/sec | 1.96 Gbits/sec | 93.8 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | busy | 670 Mbits/sec | 242 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 532 Mbits/sec | 666 Mbits/sec | 252 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 2.21 Gbits/sec | 798 Mbits/sec | 74.2 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 7.36 Gbits/sec | 2.61 Gbits/sec | 19.5 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 1.01 Gbits/sec | 1.06 Gbits/sec | 150 ms
UnixBench Tests
Benchmark Run: Sat Feb 15 2025 00:34:44 - 01:02:49
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 28437739.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4567.8 MWIPS (9.5 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2309.0 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 434778.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 113562.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1205140.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 590400.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 127813.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5664.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5011.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 668.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 323634.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 28437739.6 2436.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4567.8 830.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 2309.0 537.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 434778.8 1097.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 113562.4 686.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1205140.4 2077.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 590400.7 474.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 127813.8 319.5
Process Creation 126.0 5664.9 449.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5011.1 1181.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 668.2 1113.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 323634.7 215.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 752.4
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Streaming Unlock Tests
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Failed (Error: )
Disney+: No (IP Banned By Disney+ 1)
Netflix: Yes (Region: US)
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: US)
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: US)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
Spotify Registration: Yes (Region: CA)
OneTrust Region: CA [Ontario]
iQyi Oversea Region: US
Bing Region: US
Apple Region: US
YouTube CDN: Washington DC
Netflix Preferred CDN: Failed (CDN IP Not Found)
ChatGPT: Yes
Google Gemini: Yes (Region: USA)
Claude: Yes
Wikipedia Editability: Yes
Google Play Store: United States
Google Search CAPTCHA Free: Yes
Steam Currency: CAD
---Forum---
Reddit: No
=======================================
IP Quality Detection
Data for reference only, does not represent 100% accurate, if and the actual situation is not consistent with the manual query multiple database comparison
The following is the number of each database, the output will come with the corresponding number of the database source
ipinfo databases [0] | scamalytics databases [1] | virustotal databases [2] | abuseipdb databases [3] | ip2location databases [4]
ip-api databases [5] | ipwhois databases [6] | ipregistry databases [7] | ipdata databases [8] | db-ip databases [9]
ipapiis databases [A] | ipapicom databases [B] | bigdatacloud databases [C] | cheervision databases [D] | ipqualityscore databases [E]
IPV4:
Security Score:
Reputation: 0 [2]
TrustScore: 19 [8]
VpnScore: 98 [8]
ProxyScore: 46 [8]
CommunityVoteHarmless: 0 [2]
CommunityVoteMalicious: 0 [2]
ThreatScore: 100 [8]
FraudScore: 0 [1 E]
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0033 (Low) [A]
CompannyAbuseScore: 0.0039 (Low) [A]
ThreatLevel: low [9 B]
Blacklist_Records_Statistics(how many blacklisted websites have records):
HarmlessnessRecords: 0 [2] MaliciousRecords: 0 [2] SuspiciousRecords: 0 [2] NoRecords: 94 [2]
Security Info:
UsageType: DataCenter/WebHosting/Transit [3] business [8] corporate [9] hosting - moderate probability [C] hosting [0 7 A]
CompanyType: hosting [0 7 A]
IsCloudProvider: Yes [7 D]
IsDatacenter: No [5 6 8 C] Yes [0 1 A]
IsMobile: Yes [E] No [5 A C]
IsProxy: No [0 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E]
IsVpn: No [0 1 6 7 A C D E]
IsTor: No [0 1 3 6 7 8 A B C D E]
IsTorExit: No [1 7 D]
IsCrawler: No [9 A B E]
IsAnonymous: No [1 6 7 8 D]
IsAttacker: No [7 8 D]
IsAbuser: No [7 8 A C D E]
IsThreat: No [7 8 C D]
IsRelay: No [0 7 8 C D]
IsBogon: No [7 8 A C D]
IsBot: No [E]
DNS-BlackList: 313(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 5(Blacklisted) 20(Other)
Google search feasibility: NO
Email Port Detection
Platform SMTP SMTPS POP3 POP3S IMAP IMAPS
LocalPort ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
QQ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
163 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sohu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yandex ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Gmail ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Outlook ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Office365 ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yahoo ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailCOM ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
MailRU ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘
AOL ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
GMX ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sina ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Apple ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
FastMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ProtonMail✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MXRoute ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Namecrane ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
XYAMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ZohoMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Inbox_eu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘
Free_fr ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Looking Glass
None
Global Latency Tests
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38f58/38f58aefd8f644a6fcb1e1887b170c3a25a82d77" alt="Terabit Hosting Canada Montreal Intel Xeon E5-2670 Powerful Cloud Server Test and Review"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48980/4898093138dd653449de9ca6736578efd52a4108" alt="Terabit Hosting Canada Montreal Intel Xeon E5-2670 Powerful Cloud Server Test and Review"
Query: ping 23.137.57.7, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 23.137.57.7 – ARIN /24 AS1002 BYTEFILTER – United States [residential]
CloudFlare Internet Tests
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b31cf/b31cfabf997acc882579f5e420c9ab3f00f41911" alt="Terabit Hosting Canada Montreal Intel Xeon E5-2670 Powerful Cloud Server Test and Review"
PageSpeed Insights
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d0e0/8d0e0bb4f78e2408fe466f9bd539bb73644016f6" alt="Terabit Hosting Canada Montreal Intel Xeon E5-2670 Powerful Cloud Server Test and Review"
GTmetrix Performance
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f93d8/f93d8676ebd7bda9e89e9b532a2188714090d99f" alt="Terabit Hosting Canada Montreal Intel Xeon E5-2670 Powerful Cloud Server Test and Review"
Admin Control Panel
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31553/31553f3e0b0bc341a4726a82d954f12be9ae26e9" alt="Terabit Hosting Canada Montreal Intel Xeon E5-2670 Powerful Cloud Server Test and Review"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eafaa/eafaab24a5233eb8268d08e97d0648bc6e823232" alt="Terabit Hosting Canada Montreal Intel Xeon E5-2670 Powerful Cloud Server Test and Review"
Conclusion
Our Geekbench 6 benchmark gave the single-core performance a score of 626. For memory, we saw read speeds around 16 GB/s and write speeds near 10 GB/s in fast mode. More detailed memory tests, moving 100GB of data, showed sustained read speeds of about 4 GB/s and write speeds of roughly 3.3 GB/s. These numbers give us a good baseline for how quickly the server can access and process data in memory.
Disk performance, however, was mixed. While the 1MB block read/write tests hit speeds over 100 MB/s, the more demanding 4K block tests showed significantly slower speeds, closer to 14-20 MB/s. The Fio tests confirmed this trend, with 4k read/write speeds around 16 MB/s. This suggests the server might struggle with workloads that involve many small file operations.
Network speed tests using iperf3 showed strong results, particularly in North American locations. We saw speeds exceeding 7 Gbps sending and 2.6 Gbps receiving to New York City. Connections to Europe were also respectable; distant locations like Singapore showed usable speeds. The server also successfully unlocked several popular streaming services, including Netflix, YouTube Premium, and Amazon Prime Video, identifying its region as the US for most of them.
In conclusion, the Terabit Hosting Basic plan offers solid network performance and good memory speeds, making it a potentially suitable option for applications that prioritize network connectivity. The slower disk I/O speeds should be considered, however, if your application relies heavily on frequent small file reads and writes.
Official Website: https://Terabit.io