Little Creek Hosting United States Durham Intel Core Linux KVM VPS Test and Review
We recently tested the Little Creek Hosting United States Durham Linux KVM VPS Server (Plan: KVM-4GB). The server is powered by an Intel Core Processor (Haswell, no TSX, IBRS), with the following configuration: 4 Cores CPU/4 GB RAM/80 GB SSD Storage/1 Gbps Internet Port/6 TB Traffic/1x IPv4 and 1x IPv6 Address.
About Little Creek Hosting
Little Creek Hosting is a dynamic web hosting service provider based in Mechanicsville, Virginia, known for its commitment to affordability, quality, and comprehensive customer support. This company caters to a wide range of web hosting needs with the following features:
- Affordable Hosting Plans: Little Creek Hosting offers various hosting plans to suit different budgets, starting from basic shared web hosting to more advanced options. The shared hosting plans are ideal for small to medium-sized websites, offering the necessary resources without breaking the bank.
- Virtual Private Servers (VPS): For those who require more control and power, the VPS hosting options provide a flexible and scalable solution. These plans offer dedicated resources, increased performance, and higher security, making them suitable for growing businesses or more complex websites.
- Reseller Hosting: Entrepreneurs and web developers can benefit from reseller hosting plans, which allow them to host multiple clients under one account. This is a great way to start a web hosting business without the need for extensive infrastructure.
- 24/7 Customer Support: Little Creek Hosting prides itself on its excellent customer service. Their support team is available 24/7 to assist with any technical issues or queries, ensuring that users receive timely and effective help whenever they need it.
- Money-Back Guarantee: To ensure customer satisfaction, Little Creek Hosting offers a 30-day money-back guarantee. This allows users to try out their services risk-free and get a refund if they are not satisfied within the first 30 days.
Little Creek Hosting is a reliable choice for individuals and businesses looking for affordable, secure, and user-friendly web hosting solutions, backed by top-notch customer support and a range of value-added features.
Pricing
Official Website: https://www.LittleCreekHosting.com
Coupon
The merchant did not provide
Basic Information
Processor : Intel Core Processor (Haswell, no TSX, IBRS)
CPU Numbers : 4
CPU Frequency : 2499.996 MHz
CPU Cache : L1: 256.00 KB / L2: 16.00 MB / L3: 0.00 KB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✘ Disabled
RAM : 388.34 MiB / 3.84 GiB
Swap : 268 KiB / 4.00 GiB
Disk Space : 3.02 GiB / 75.78 GiB
Boot Disk : /dev/vda1
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 40 min
Loads : 7.55, 4.52, 2.50
OS Release : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) (x86_64)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel Version : 5.10.0-8-amd64
TCP Acceleration : bbr
VM Type : KVM
NAT Type : Full Cone
IPV4 ASN : AS174 Cogent Communications
IPV4 Location : Durham / North Carolina / US
GB6 Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 787
Multi Core | 2015
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/10176327
YABS completed in 9 min 44 sec
RAM Read/Write Tests
----------------------------Memory-Test---------------------------------
-> Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
Single Read Test: 13751.93 MB/s
Single Write Test: 10146.45 MB/s
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: read
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 38510360 (3850280.98 per second)
37607.77 MiB transferred (3760.04 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0001s
total number of events: 38510360
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 20.05
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 3379.12
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 38510360.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 3.3791/0.00
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: write
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 29492171 (2948648.66 per second)
28800.95 MiB transferred (2879.54 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0001s
total number of events: 29492171
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 20.03
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 4846.86
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 29492171.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 4.8469/0.00
Disk Read/Write Tests
------------------------Disk-dd-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
-> Disk test in progress (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode)
Block Size Write Test Read Test
100MB-4K Block 21.5 MB/s (5241 IOPS, 4.88s) 19.6 MB/s (4787 IOPS, 5.35s)
1GB-1M Block 925 MB/s (883 IOPS, 1.13s) 1.1 GB/s (1046 IOPS, 0.96s)
-----------------------Disk-fio-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 132.19 MB/s (33.0k) | 481.50 MB/s (7.5k)
Write | 132.54 MB/s (33.1k) | 484.03 MB/s (7.5k)
Total | 264.74 MB/s (66.1k) | 965.53 MB/s (15.0k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 648.32 MB/s (1.2k) | 684.27 MB/s (668)
Write | 682.77 MB/s (1.3k) | 729.85 MB/s (712)
Total | 1.33 GB/s (2.5k) | 1.41 GB/s (1.3k)
Iperf3 Network Tests
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 813 Mbits/sec | 47.0 Mbits/sec | 82.5 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 769 Mbits/sec | 814 Mbits/sec | 93.4 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 763 Mbits/sec | 109 Mbits/sec | 176 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 710 Mbits/sec | 325 Mbits/sec | 226 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 812 Mbits/sec | 233 Mbits/sec | 62.7 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 878 Mbits/sec | 683 Mbits/sec | 14.0 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 777 Mbits/sec | 99.6 Mbits/sec | 122 ms UnixBench Tests
Benchmark Run: Tue Jan 28 2025 23:47:53 - 00:16:01
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 34116192.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 5301.6 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2750.9 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 446913.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 114206.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1039126.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 721096.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 88302.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 4879.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6940.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2098.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 407840.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 34116192.5 2923.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5301.6 963.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 2750.9 639.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 446913.5 1128.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 114206.1 690.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1039126.1 1791.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 721096.8 579.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 88302.5 220.8
Process Creation 126.0 4879.8 387.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6940.8 1637.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2098.5 3497.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 407840.1 271.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 872.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Jan 29 2025 00:16:01 - 00:44:27
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 115009467.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 20649.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 8160.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 690840.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 197529.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1938407.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2667628.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 330642.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 19943.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 17531.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2572.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1398246.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 115009467.9 9855.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 20649.3 3754.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 8160.1 1897.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 690840.7 1744.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 197529.7 1193.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1938407.7 3342.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2667628.9 2144.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 330642.9 826.6
Process Creation 126.0 19943.7 1582.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 17531.2 4134.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2572.6 4287.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1398246.7 932.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2306.4
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Streaming Unlock Tests
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Yes (Region: US)
Disney+: Yes (Region: US)
Netflix: Yes (Region: US)
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: US)
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: US)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
Spotify Registration: Yes (Region: US)
OneTrust Region: US [North Carolina]
iQyi Oversea Region: US
Bing Region: US
YouTube CDN: Chicago, IL
Netflix Preferred CDN: Washington DC
ChatGPT: Yes
Google Gemini: Yes (Region: USA)
Claude: Yes
Wikipedia Editability: Yes
Google Play Store: United States
Google Search CAPTCHA Free: Yes
Steam Currency: USD
---Forum---
Reddit: Yes
=======================================
IP Quality Detection
Data for reference only, does not represent 100% accurate, if and the actual situation is not consistent with the manual query multiple database comparison
The following is the number of each database, the output will come with the corresponding number of the database source
ipinfo databases [0] | scamalytics databases [1] | virustotal databases [2] | abuseipdb databases [3] | ip2location databases [4]
ip-api databases [5] | ipwhois databases [6] | ipregistry databases [7] | ipdata databases [8] | db-ip databases [9]
ipapiis databases [A] | ipapicom databases [B] | bigdatacloud databases [C] | cheervision databases [D] | ipqualityscore databases [E]
IPV4:
Security Score:
Reputation: 0 [2]
TrustScore: 1 [8]
VpnScore: 98 [8]
ProxyScore: 100 [8]
CommunityVoteHarmless: 0 [2]
CommunityVoteMalicious: 0 [2]
ThreatScore: 100 [8]
FraudScore: 0 [1]
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0001 (Very Low) [A]
CompannyAbuseScore: 0.0146 (Elevated) [A]
ThreatLevel: low [9 B]
Blacklist_Records_Statistics(how many blacklisted websites have records):
HarmlessnessRecords: 0 [2] MaliciousRecords: 0 [2] SuspiciousRecords: 0 [2] NoRecords: 94 [2]
Security Info:
UsageType: corporate [9] FixedLineISP [3] hosting - high probability [C] isp [0 7 A] business [8]
CompanyType: business [A] isp [0 7]
IsCloudProvider: No [7 D]
IsDatacenter: Yes [1 A] No [0 5 6 8 C]
IsMobile: No [5 A C]
IsProxy: No [0 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D]
IsVpn: No [0 1 6 7 A C D]
IsTorExit: No [1 7 D]
IsTorExit: No [1 7 D]
IsCrawler: No [9 A B]
IsAnonymous: No [1 6 7 8 D]
IsAttacker: No [7 8 D]
IsAbuser: No [7 8 A C D]
IsThreat: No [7 8 C D]
IsRelay: No [0 7 8 C D]
IsBogon: No [7 8 A C D]
DNS-BlackList: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 8(Blacklisted) 152(Other)
Google search feasibility: NO
Email Port Detection
Platform SMTP SMTPS POP3 POP3S IMAP IMAPS
LocalPort ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
QQ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
163 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sohu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yandex ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Gmail ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Outlook ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Office365 ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yahoo ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailCOM ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
MailRU ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘
AOL ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
GMX ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sina ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Apple ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
FastMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ProtonMail✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MXRoute ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Namecrane ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
XYAMail ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
ZohoMail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Inbox_eu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘
Free_fr ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ Looking Glass
None
Global Latency Tests
Query: ping 38.45.66.214, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 38.45.66.214 – ARIN /9 AS174 COGENT – United States, North Carolina, Durham [hosting]
CloudFlare Internet Tests
PageSpeed Insights
GTmetrix Performance
Admin Control Panel
Conclusion
We recently put a Little Creek Hosting server to the test. This server, located in Durham, USA, uses a Linux KVM and has a good setup: an Intel Core processor with 4 cores, 4GB of RAM, and 80GB of SSD storage. It also has a fast 1Gbps internet connection with 6TB of data transfer.
The server’s processor and memory performed well. We saw fast read and write speeds for both RAM and disk. The network tests showed good speeds when sending data to different locations, though receiving speeds varied. The server also successfully unlocked popular streaming services in the US region, which is great for accessing content.
We also checked the server’s IP address. It seems to be a regular business IP, not a VPN or proxy. It didn’t show up on any blacklists, which is a good sign. Finally, we tested email ports, and most worked correctly with popular email providers, except for some encrypted ports.
In conclusion, this Little Creek Hosting server is a solid option. It has the power and speed you need for most tasks, and it works well with streaming services. The network performance is generally good, and the IP address seems clean. It’s a good choice if you need a reliable server in the US.
Official Website: https://www.LittleCreekHosting.com
Related Posts
Lets Hosting is a hosting media powered by human+AI and offers a wide range of information and resources for anyone looking for web hosting solutions. From VPS to dedicated servers, LetsHosting.com provides guides and reviews on various hosting options to help people make informed decisions about their hosting needs.
