Fotbo Netherlands Serverius AMD EPYC-Rome Hourly Payment Cheap VPS Test and Review
We recently tested the Fotbo Netherlands Serverius Hourly Payment Cheap VPS (Plan: R-Basic-AMD) to evaluate its performance and capabilities. An AMD EPYC-Rome Processor powers the server and comes with a configuration of 2 CPU cores, 5 GB RAM, 35 GB SSD storage, a 1000 Mbps internet port, and 1x IPv4 and 1x IPv6 address. The operating system is Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye), and the server runs on a KVM virtual machine with full-cone NAT support.
About Fotbo
Founded in 2018 and headquartered in Riga, Latvia, with an additional office in Ukraine, Fotbo offers a range of services, including Cloud VPS, VPC (Virtual Private Cloud), Load Balancers, and VPN. Fotbo stands out in the competitive server provider market, focusing on technical support, innovation, and reliability. By leveraging private hardware, advanced OpenStack technology, and certified European data centers, Fotbo delivers high-quality, flexible, and cost-effective solutions. Whether for individual users or enterprises, Fotbo is a trusted partner for achieving success in the digital age.
Official Website: https://www.Fotbo.com
Basic Information
Processor : AMD EPYC-Rome Processor
CPU Numbers : 2
CPU Frequency : 2599.998 MHz
CPU Cache : L1: 128.00 KB / L2: 1.00 MB / L3: 32.00 MB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✘ Disabled
RAM : 347.47 MiB / 4.81 GiB
Swap : [ no swap partition or swap file detected ]
Disk Space : 2.05 GiB / 34.29 GiB
Boot Disk : /dev/vda1
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 8 min
Loads : 0.83, 0.70, 0.38
OS Release : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) (x86_64)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel Version : 5.10.0-28-amd64
TCP Acceleration : bbr
VM Type : KVM
NAT Type : Full Cone
IPV4 ASN : AS211381 Podaon SIA
IPV4 Location : Oude Meer / North Holland / NL
IPV6 ASN : AS211381 Podaon SIA
IPV6 Location : Oude Meer / North Holland / The Netherlands
IPV6 Subnet Mask : 128
GB6 Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 1310
Multi Core | 2344
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9841761
YABS completed in 7 min 36 sec
RAM Read/Write Tests
----------------------------Memory-Test---------------------------------
-> Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
Single Read Test: 41904.60 MB/s
Single Write Test: 18562.36 MB/s
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: read
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 62896570 (6288976.78 per second)
61422.43 MiB transferred (6141.58 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0001s
total number of events: 62896570
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 2.23
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 3225.07
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 62896570.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 3.2251/0.00
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: write
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 53398905 (5339343.48 per second)
52147.37 MiB transferred (5214.20 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0001s
total number of events: 53398905
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 2.28
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 4303.15
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 53398905.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 4.3032/0.00
Disk Read/Write Tests
------------------------Disk-dd-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
-> Disk test in progress (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode)
Block Size Write Test Read Test
100MB-4K Block 1.4 MB/s (349 IOPS, 73.29s) 14.5 MB/s (3548 IOPS, 7.22s)
1GB-1M Block 378 MB/s (361 IOPS, 2.77s) 1.9 GB/s (1849 IOPS, 0.54s)
-----------------------Disk-fio-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 1.36 MB/s (341) | 21.93 MB/s (342)
Write | 1.40 MB/s (350) | 22.44 MB/s (350)
Total | 2.76 MB/s (691) | 44.37 MB/s (692)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 164.80 MB/s (321) | 328.46 MB/s (320)
Write | 173.55 MB/s (338) | 350.33 MB/s (342)
Total | 338.35 MB/s (659) | 678.79 MB/s (662)
Iperf3 Network Tests
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 1.09 Gbits/sec | 942 Mbits/sec | 8.17 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 1.10 Gbits/sec | 951 Mbits/sec | 0.954 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | busy | busy | 90.8 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 888 Mbits/sec | 549 Mbits/sec | 163 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 963 Mbits/sec | 574 Mbits/sec | 134 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | busy | 853 Mbits/sec | 75.5 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 875 Mbits/sec | 317 Mbits/sec | 218 ms
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 1.09 Gbits/sec | 925 Mbits/sec | 8.10 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 1.10 Gbits/sec | 936 Mbits/sec | 0.842 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | busy | busy | 90.7 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 924 Mbits/sec | 753 Mbits/sec | --
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 968 Mbits/sec | 632 Mbits/sec | 135 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 1.03 Gbits/sec | 853 Mbits/sec | 75.3 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 881 Mbits/sec | 183 Mbits/sec | 218 ms UnixBench Tests
Benchmark Run: Thu Jan 09 2025 01:08:46 - 01:36:48
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 38414582.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7052.7 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5257.8 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1002679.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 265679.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2724864.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1691397.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 138814.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 9302.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 12074.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2255.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1866186.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38414582.7 3291.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7052.7 1282.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 5257.8 1222.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1002679.8 2532.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 265679.7 1605.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2724864.1 4698.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1691397.3 1359.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 138814.9 347.0
Process Creation 126.0 9302.0 738.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 12074.5 2847.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2255.4 3759.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1866186.1 1244.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1666.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Jan 09 2025 01:36:48 - 02:04:51
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 76277636.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 14094.4 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7749.5 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1075899.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 260808.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3423390.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 3362345.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 405287.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 21909.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 16856.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2266.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2957634.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 76277636.2 6536.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 14094.4 2562.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 7749.5 1802.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1075899.1 2716.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 260808.9 1575.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3423390.3 5902.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3362345.4 2702.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 405287.6 1013.2
Process Creation 126.0 21909.6 1738.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 16856.7 3975.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2266.4 3777.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2957634.2 1971.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2626.1
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Streaming Unlock Tests
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Yes (Region: NL)
Disney+: Yes (Region: NL)
Netflix: Yes (Region: NL)
YouTube Premium: No
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: NL)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
Spotify Registration: No
OneTrust Region: NL [North Holland]
iQyi Oversea Region: INTL
Bing Region: NL
YouTube CDN: Amsterdam
Netflix Preferred CDN: Failed (CDN IP Not Found)
ChatGPT: Yes
Google Gemini: No
Wikipedia Editability: Yes
Google Play Store: Russia
Google Search CAPTCHA Free: Yes
Steam Currency: EUR
---Forum---
Reddit: Yes
=======================================
IP Quality Detection
Data for reference only, does not represent 100% accurate, if and the actual situation is not consistent with the manual query multiple database comparison
The following is the number of each database, the output will come with the corresponding number of the database source
ipinfo databases [0] | scamalytics databases [1] | virustotal databases [2] | abuseipdb databases [3] | ip2location databases [4]
ip-api databases [5] | ipwhois databases [6] | ipregistry databases [7] | ipdata databases [8] | db-ip databases [9]
ipapiis databases [A] | ipapicom databases [B] | bigdatacloud databases [C] | cheervision databases [D] | ipqualityscore databases [E]
IPV4:
Security Score:
Reputation: 0 [2]
TrustScore: 1 [8]
VpnScore: 99 [8]
ProxyScore: 98 [8]
CommunityVoteHarmless: 0 [2]
CommunityVoteMalicious: 0 [2]
ThreatScore: 100 [8]
FraudScore: 0 [1] 65 [E]
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0075 (Low) [A]
CompannyAbuseScore: 0.0078 (Low) [A]
ThreatLevel: low [9 B]
Blacklist_Records_Statistics(how many blacklisted websites have records):
HarmlessnessRecords: 0 [2] MaliciousRecords: 0 [2] SuspiciousRecords: 0 [2] NoRecords: 94 [2]
Security Info:
UsageType: corporate [9] hosting [0 7 A] DataCenter/WebHosting/Transit [3] business [8] hosting - high probability [C]
CompanyType: hosting [0 A] business [7]
IsCloudProvider: Yes [7 D]
IsDatacenter: No [1 5 6 8] Yes [0 A C]
IsMobile: No [5 A C] Yes [E]
IsProxy: No [0 1 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D] Yes [E]
IsVpn: Yes [E] No [0 1 6 7 A C D]
IsTor: No [0 1 3 6 7 8 A B C D E]
IsTorExit: No [1 7 D]
IsCrawler: No [9 A B E]
IsAnonymous: No [1 6 7 8 D]
IsAttacker: No [7 8 D]
IsAbuser: No [7 8 A C D E]
IsThreat: No [7 8 C D]
IsRelay: No [0 7 8 C D]
IsBogon: No [7 8 A C D]
IsBot: No [E]
DNS-BlackList: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 5(Blacklisted) 19(Other)
IPV6:
Security Score:
FraudScore: 0 [1]
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0075 (Low) [A]
CompannyAbuseScore: 0 (Very Low) [A]
ThreatLevel: low [B]
Security Info:
UsageType: hosting [A] DataCenter/WebHosting/Transit [3]
CompanyType: hosting [A]
IsCloudProvider: Yes [D]
IsDatacenter: Yes [1 A]
IsMobile: No [A]
IsProxy: No [1 A B D]
IsVpn: No [1 A D]
IsTorExit: No [1 D]
IsTorExit: No [1 D]
IsCrawler: No [A B]
IsAnonymous: No [1 D]
IsAttacker: No [D]
IsAbuser: No [A D]
IsThreat: No [D]
IsRelay: No [D]
IsBogon: No [A D]
DNS-BlackList: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 0(Blacklisted) 314(Other)
Google search feasibility: YES
Email Port Detection
Platform SMTP SMTPS POP3 POP3S IMAP IMAPS
LocalPort ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
QQ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
163 ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sohu ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yandex ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Gmail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Outlook ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Office365 ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yahoo ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailCOM ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
MailRU ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
AOL ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
GMX ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sina ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ Looking Glass
None
Global Latency Tests
Query: ping 45.132.107.66, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 45.132.107.66 – /24 AS211381 PODAON Podaon SIA – The Netherlands, North Holland, Oude Meer [hosting]
CloudFlare Internet Tests
PageSpeed Insights
GTmetrix Performance
Admin Control Panel
Server Pricing
Official Website: https://www.Fotbo.com
Coupon
The merchant did not provide
Conclusion
The Geekbench 6 benchmark revealed solid performance, with a single-core score of 1310 and a multi-core score of 2344, indicating decent processing power for lightweight workloads. The RAM speed tests showed impressive results, with read speeds of 41,904.60 MB/s and write speeds of 18,562.36 MB/s, making it suitable for memory-intensive tasks. Disk performance was also tested, with 4K block write speeds of 1.4 MB/s (349 IOPS) and 1M block read speeds of 1.9 GB/s (1849 IOPS), demonstrating reliable storage performance for small to medium-sized applications.
Network performance was highlighted, with iperf3 tests showing near-gigabit speeds across multiple locations. For example, the server achieved 1.10 Gbits/sec send and 951 Mbits/sec receive speeds in Amsterdam, with a ping of just 0.954 ms. Even international connections, such as to Los Angeles and Singapore, maintained strong speeds, averaging around 900 Mbits/sec. The server also performed well in streaming unlock tests, successfully accessing platforms like Netflix, Disney+, and Amazon Prime Video with a Dutch region lock. However, YouTube Premium and Google Gemini were not accessible.
In terms of IP quality and security, the server scored well, with low threat levels and no malicious records across multiple databases. The IP addresses were flagged as corporate/hosting usage, with no significant security risks detected. Email port detection showed full support for SMTP, POP3, and IMAP protocols locally, though some external email providers like Gmail and Outlook had limited compatibility.
The Fotbo Netherlands Serverius VPS offers a solid balance of performance, reliability, and affordability, making it a great choice for small-scale projects or lightweight hosting needs. Its strong network performance, decent CPU and RAM speeds, and reliable disk performance make it suitable for tasks like web hosting, streaming, or development environments. While it has some limitations, such as restricted access to certain streaming platforms and email providers, it remains a cost-effective option for users seeking hourly billing flexibility.
Official Website: https://www.Fotbo.com
Related Posts
