DEAC Delska Germany Frankfurt Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y High Performance Cloud Server Test and Review
We put DEAC‘s Frankfurt high-performance cloud server to the test, examining its performance across various metrics. This €38.72/month plan boasts a 2-core Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y processor, 4GB of RAM, an 80GB SSD, and a 1 Gbps network connection. Our initial assessment confirmed the advertised specifications and a clean Debian 11 installation.
About DEAC Delska
Delska is a joint brand launched in June 2024 by Latvia’s data center operator DEAC and Lithuania’s Data Logistics Center (DLC). Both companies have been acquired by Swiss Quaero European Infrastructure Fund II. Delska offers a range of IT and network services in Northern Europe, including data centers, cloud computing, dedicated servers, and more.
Official Website: https://delska.com
Basic Information
Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4410Y
CPU Numbers : 2
CPU Frequency : 2000.000 MHz
CPU Cache : L1: 128.00 KB / L2: 8.00 MB / L3: 32.00 MB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 305.98 MiB / 3.83 GiB
Swap : [ no swap partition or swap file detected ]
Disk Space : 1.72 GiB / 78.58 GiB
Boot Disk : /dev/vda1
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 9 min
Loads : 0.08, 0.12, 0.07
OS Release : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) (x86_64)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel Version : 5.10.0-30-amd64
TCP Acceleration : bbr
VM Type : KVM
NAT Type : Full Cone
IPV4 ASN : AS12993 SIA Digitalas Ekonomikas Attistibas Centrs
IPV4 Location : Frankfurt am Main / Hesse / DE
GB6 Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 1619
Multi Core | 2861
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9757808
YABS completed in 6 min 59 sec
RAM Read/Write Tests
----------------------------Memory-Test---------------------------------
-> Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
Single Read Test: 34539.06 MB/s
Single Write Test: 20041.07 MB/s
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: read
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 57691403 (5768219.33 per second)
56339.26 MiB transferred (5633.03 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0001s
total number of events: 57691403
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 6.53
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 3136.29
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 57691403.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 3.1363/0.00
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: write
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 48675609 (4866820.31 per second)
47534.77 MiB transferred (4752.75 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0001s
total number of events: 48675609
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 2.93
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 4174.03
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 48675609.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 4.1740/0.00
Disk Read/Write Tests
------------------------Disk-dd-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
-> Disk test in progress (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode)
Block Size Write Test Read Test
100MB-4K Block 45.4 MB/s (11.10 IOPS, 2.31s)) 58.5 MB/s (14281 IOPS, 1.79s)
1GB-1M Block 640 MB/s (610 IOPS, 1.64s) 1.8 GB/s (1740 IOPS, 0.57s)
-----------------------Disk-fio-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 19.24 MB/s (4.8k) | 91.07 MB/s (1.4k)
Write | 19.25 MB/s (4.8k) | 91.55 MB/s (1.4k)
Total | 38.50 MB/s (9.6k) | 182.63 MB/s (2.8k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 268.94 MB/s (525) | 426.91 MB/s (416)
Write | 283.23 MB/s (553) | 455.35 MB/s (444)
Total | 552.17 MB/s (1.0k) | 882.26 MB/s (860)
Network Upload/Download Tests
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Speedtest.net 937.24 Mbps 949.01 Mbps 23.73 ms
Los Angeles, US 489.14 Mbps 2015.14 Mbps 187.49 ms
Dallas, US 577.07 Mbps 1587.23 Mbps 156.14 ms
Montreal, CA 332.85 Mbps 948.12 Mbps 125.88 ms
Paris, FR 2015.52 Mbps 2119.93 Mbps 36.96 ms
Amsterdam, NL 2072.53 Mbps 1886.64 Mbps 30.04 ms
Hong Kong, CN 332.42 Mbps 1401.26 Mbps 249.82 ms
Singapore, SG 133.53 Mbps 490.20 Mbps 247.35 ms
Tokyo, JP 312.83 Mbps 2104.23 Mbps 259.27 ms UnixBench Tests
Benchmark Run: Sat Jan 04 2025 14:43:44 - 15:11:45
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 43181486.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 6303.0 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5659.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1296805.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 359167.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3811241.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2311949.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 143654.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 8128.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 12765.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2307.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2269302.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 43181486.4 3700.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6303.0 1146.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 5659.8 1316.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1296805.5 3274.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 359167.6 2170.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3811241.8 6571.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2311949.2 1858.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 143654.4 359.1
Process Creation 126.0 8128.2 645.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 12765.7 3010.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2307.0 3844.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2269302.7 1512.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1881.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Jan 04 2025 15:11:45 - 15:39:47
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 88201307.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 12597.2 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7329.4 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 561131.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 143160.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1770555.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 4605629.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 474272.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 17715.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 17159.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2368.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2306155.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 88201307.4 7558.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 12597.2 2290.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 7329.4 1704.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 561131.5 1417.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 143160.6 865.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1770555.7 3052.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4605629.2 3702.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 474272.8 1185.7
Process Creation 126.0 17715.8 1406.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 17159.1 4047.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2368.8 3948.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2306155.1 1537.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2248.9
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Streaming Unlock Tests
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Failed (Error: )
Disney+: No (IP Banned By Disney+ 1)
Netflix: Originals Only
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: LV)
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: LV)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
Spotify Registration: No
OneTrust Region: LV [Unknown]
iQyi Oversea Region: INTL
Bing Region: WW
YouTube CDN: [LATTELECOM] in [Riga]
Netflix Preferred CDN: Failed (CDN IP Not Found)
ChatGPT: Yes
Google Gemini: No
Wikipedia Editability: Yes
Google Play Store: Latvia
Google Search CAPTCHA Free: Yes
Steam Currency: EUR
---Forum---
Reddit: No
=======================================
IP Quality Detection
Data for reference only, does not represent 100% accurate, if and the actual situation is not consistent with the manual query multiple database comparison
The following is the number of each database, the output will come with the corresponding number of the database source
ipinfo databases [0] | scamalytics databases [1] | virustotal databases [2] | abuseipdb databases [3] | ip2location databases [4]
ip-api databases [5] | ipwhois databases [6] | ipregistry databases [7] | ipdata databases [8] | db-ip databases [9]
ipapiis databases [A] | ipapicom databases [B] | bigdatacloud databases [C] | cheervision databases [D] | ipqualityscore databases [E]
IPV4:
Security Score:
Reputation: 0 [2]
TrustScore: 8 [8]
VpnScore: 77 [8]
ProxyScore: 99 [8]
CommunityVoteHarmless: 0 [2]
CommunityVoteMalicious: 0 [2]
ThreatScore: 100 [8]
FraudScore: 65 [E] 0 [1]
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0022 (Low) [A]
CompannyAbuseScore: 0 (Very Low) [A]
ThreatLevel: low [9 B]
Blacklist_Records_Statistics(how many blacklisted websites have records):
HarmlessnessRecords: 0 [2] MaliciousRecords: 0 [2] SuspiciousRecords: 0 [2] NoRecords: 94 [2]
Security Info:
UsageType: hosting [0 7 A] corporate [9] DataCenter/WebHosting/Transit [3] unknown [C] business [8]
CompanyType: hosting [0 7 A]
IsCloudProvider: Yes [7 D]
IsDatacenter: No [8 C] Yes [0 1 5 6 A]
IsMobile: No [5 A C] Yes [E]
IsProxy: Yes [E] No [0 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D]
IsVpn: Yes [E] No [0 1 6 7 A C D]
IsTor: No [0 1 3 6 7 8 A B C D E]
IsTorExit: No [1 7 D]
IsCrawler: No [9 A B E]
IsAnonymous: No [1 6 7 8 D]
IsAttacker: No [7 8 D]
IsAbuser: No [7 8 A C D E]
IsThreat: No [7 8 C D]
IsRelay: No [0 7 8 C D]
IsBogon: No [7 8 A C D]
IsBot: No [E]
DNS-BlackList: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 5(Blacklisted) 15(Other)
Google search feasibility: YES
Email Port Detection
Platform SMTP SMTPS POP3 POP3S IMAP IMAPS
LocalPort ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
QQ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
163 ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sohu ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yandex ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Gmail ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Outlook ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Office365 ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yahoo ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailCOM ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
MailRU ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘
AOL ✘ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
GMX ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sina ✘ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ Looking Glass
None
Global Latency Tests
Query: ping 37.203.38.13, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 37.203.38.13 – /24 AS12993 DEAC-AS SIA – Latvia [hosting]
CloudFlare Internet Tests
PageSpeed Insights
GTmetrix Performance
Admin Control Panel
Server Pricing
Official Website: https://delska.com
Coupon
Promotion: Buy VMware Public Cloud and get 3 months free!
Conclusion
Geekbench 6 results revealed decent single-core and multi-core performance, scoring 1619 and 2861 respectively. This suggests adequate processing power for everyday tasks and moderately demanding applications. The YABS benchmark was completed in just under 7 minutes, further indicating respectable overall system responsiveness.
Memory performance was evaluated using both a quick test and a more thorough benchmark. While the quick test showed promising read/write speeds, the sustained test revealed more moderate figures, typical for this hardware configuration. Disk performance, assessed with dd and fio, showcased good speeds, particularly for larger block sizes, highlighting the benefits of the SSD.
Network tests demonstrated excellent speeds, consistently near the advertised 1 Gbps, especially within Europe. Connections to North American and Asian servers showed expected latency variations. Streaming service access was a mixed bag, with some platforms fully accessible and others restricted or unavailable, likely due to regional licensing limitations.
Finally, IP quality checks flagged the server IP as potentially associated with hosting or corporate use, which is common for cloud servers. While some services marked it as a potential proxy, this doesn’t necessarily indicate a problem and is often a characteristic of data center IPs. Email port testing confirmed standard functionality for most common providers.
In conclusion, the DEAC Frankfurt cloud server delivers solid performance for its price point, particularly in terms of network speed and disk I/O. While the CPU and RAM are not top-of-the-line, they are sufficient for many applications. The mixed results for streaming access highlight the importance of considering regional restrictions when choosing a server location. Overall, this server offers a good balance of performance and affordability for users seeking a European-based cloud solution.
Official Website: https://delska.com
Related Posts
