Aéza Russia Moscow Shared AMD Ryzen 9 9950X anti-DDoS Cloud Virtual Server Test and Review
We put the Aéza Moscow MSKs-2 shared cloud server to the test, examining its performance across various metrics. This server boasts an AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core processor, though our test configuration utilized 2 cores, 4GB of RAM, and 60GB of SSD storage, along with a high-speed internet port and unlimited traffic. Our initial assessment focused on basic server information, confirming the hardware specifications and operating system details.
About Aéza
Aeza.net is a modern web hosting provider that has quickly made a name for itself in the industry. Here are some key features that set Aeza apart:
- Cutting-Edge Technology: Aeza uses state-of-the-art hardware, including AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and AMD Threadripper 3990X processors, ensuring lightning-fast performance and reliability.
- Robust Security: Aeza includes built-in Anti-DDoS protection as a standard feature, providing top-notch security for your website.
- Exceptional Customer Support: They offer 24/7 support, promptly resolving any issues.
- Affordable Pricing: Despite offering high-end hardware and robust security features, Aeza keeps its pricing competitive.
- Scalability and Flexibility: Aeza offers scalable hosting solutions that can be adjusted as your business grows.
Aeza aims to provide high-quality, affordable hosting solutions focusing on customer satisfaction. Whether you’re a small business owner, a blogger, or an enterprise, Aeza has the tools and expertise to help you succeed online.
Official Website: https://www.aéza.net
Basic Information
Processor : AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor
CPU Numbers : 2
CPU Frequency : 4291.952 MHz
CPU Cache : L1: 256.00 KB / L2: 1.00 MB / L3: 16.00 MB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 285.75 MiB / 3.83 GiB
Swap : 0 KiB / 512.00 MiB
Disk Space : 2.18 GiB / 58.97 GiB
Boot Disk : /dev/vda2
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 8 min
Loads : 1.28, 0.37, 0.12
OS Release : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) (x86_64)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel Version : 5.10.0-33-amd64
TCP Acceleration : bbr
VM Type : KVM
NAT Type : Full Cone
IPV4 ASN : AS216246 Aeza Group LLC
IPV4 Location : Moscow / Moscow / RU
IPV6 ASN : AS210644 Aeza International
IPV6 Location : Amsterdam / North Holland / The Netherlands
IPV6 Subnet Mask : 48
GB6 Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 3134
Multi Core | 5472
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9722947
YABS completed in 5 min 5 sec
RAM Read/Write Tests
----------------------------Memory-Test---------------------------------
-> Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
Single Read Test: 102831.75 MB/s
Single Write Test: 39247.04 MB/s
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: read
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 104857600 (11259113.08 per second)
102400.00 MiB transferred (10995.23 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 9.3125s
total number of events: 104857600
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 0.18
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 2730.69
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 104857600.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 2.7307/0.00
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: write
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 94228131 (9422127.90 per second)
92019.66 MiB transferred (9201.30 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0001s
total number of events: 94228131
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 0.18
95th percentile: 0.00
sum: 3864.30
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 94228131.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 3.8643/0.00
Disk Read/Write Tests
------------------------Disk-dd-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
-> Disk test in progress (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode)
Block Size Write Test Read Test
100MB-4K Block 42.6 MB/s (10.41 IOPS, 2.46s)) 42.2 MB/s (10313 IOPS, 2.48s)
1GB-1M Block 3.0 GB/s (2837 IOPS, 0.35s) 3.3 GB/s (3105 IOPS, 0.32s)
-----------------------Disk-fio-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 40.02 MB/s (10.0k) | 656.30 MB/s (10.2k)
Write | 40.12 MB/s (10.0k) | 659.76 MB/s (10.3k)
Total | 80.14 MB/s (20.0k) | 1.31 GB/s (20.5k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 2.02 GB/s (3.9k) | 2.21 GB/s (2.1k)
Write | 2.13 GB/s (4.1k) | 2.36 GB/s (2.3k)
Total | 4.15 GB/s (8.1k) | 4.58 GB/s (4.4k)
Iperf3 Network Tests
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 3.18 Gbits/sec | 1.48 Gbits/sec | 45.7 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 250 Mbits/sec | 293 Mbits/sec | 69.9 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 413 Mbits/sec | 78.3 Mbits/sec | 49.7 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 17.6 Mbits/sec | busy | 228 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 23.4 Mbits/sec | 23.0 Mbits/sec | 173 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 1.95 Gbits/sec | 1.35 Gbits/sec | 128 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 484 Mbits/sec | 209 Mbits/sec | 246 ms
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 519 Mbits/sec | 4.03 Gbits/sec | 45.7 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 504 Mbits/sec | 322 Mbits/sec | 70.0 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 118 Mbits/sec | 2.37 Gbits/sec | 49.7 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 34.1 Mbits/sec | 2.34 Gbits/sec | 228 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 915 Mbits/sec | 1.27 Gbits/sec | 173 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 2.67 Gbits/sec | 2.91 Gbits/sec | 128 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 106 Mbits/sec | 989 Mbits/sec | 245 ms UnixBench Tests
Benchmark Run: Thu Jan 02 2025 03:43:37 - 04:11:56
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 99190214.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 12870.5 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 13082.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2899259.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 755942.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 8588927.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 5194983.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 198355.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 28435.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 18885.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3955.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 4566585.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 99190214.9 8499.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 12870.5 2340.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 13082.7 3042.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 2899259.8 7321.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 755942.5 4567.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 8588927.6 14808.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 5194983.9 4176.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 198355.4 495.9
Process Creation 126.0 28435.2 2256.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 18885.1 4454.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3955.6 6592.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 4566585.2 3044.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 3903.6
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Jan 02 2025 04:11:56 - 04:39:52
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 163503482.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 23764.1 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 17731.4 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3260183.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 792882.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 8473776.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 8730358.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 816725.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 49182.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 32194.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4456.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 6828980.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 163503482.8 14010.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 23764.1 4320.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 17731.4 4123.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 3260183.3 8232.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 792882.3 4790.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 8473776.6 14610.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 8730358.4 7018.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 816725.5 2041.8
Process Creation 126.0 49182.7 3903.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 32194.2 7593.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4456.7 7427.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 6828980.8 4552.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 5973.9
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Streaming Unlock Tests
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Failed (Error: )
Disney+: No (IP Banned By Disney+ 1)
Netflix: No
YouTube Premium: No
Amazon Prime Video: No (Service Not Available)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
Spotify Registration: No
OneTrust Region: RU [Moscow]
iQyi Oversea Region: US
Bing Region: RU (Risky)
YouTube CDN: Stockholm
Netflix Preferred CDN: Failed (IP Banned By Netflix)
ChatGPT: No (Only Available with Mobile APP)
Google Gemini: No
Wikipedia Editability: Yes
Google Play Store: Russia
Google Search CAPTCHA Free: Yes
Steam Currency: RUB
---Forum---
Reddit: No
=======================================
IP Quality Detection
Data for reference only, does not represent 100% accurate, if and the actual situation is not consistent with the manual query multiple database comparison
The following is the number of each database, the output will come with the corresponding number of the database source
ipinfo databases [0] | scamalytics databases [1] | virustotal databases [2] | abuseipdb databases [3] | ip2location databases [4]
ip-api databases [5] | ipwhois databases [6] | ipregistry databases [7] | ipdata databases [8] | db-ip databases [9]
ipapiis databases [A] | ipapicom databases [B] | bigdatacloud databases [C] | cheervision databases [D] | ipqualityscore databases [E]
IPV4:
Security Score:
Reputation: 0 [2]
TrustScore: 68 [8]
VpnScore: 17 [8]
ProxyScore: 54 [8]
CommunityVoteHarmless: 0 [2]
CommunityVoteMalicious: 0 [2]
ThreatScore: 24 [8]
FraudScore: 0 [1 E]
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0191 (Elevated) [A]
CompannyAbuseScore: 0.0024 (Low) [A]
ThreatLevel: low [9 B]
Blacklist_Records_Statistics(how many blacklisted websites have records):
HarmlessnessRecords: 0 [2] MaliciousRecords: 0 [2] SuspiciousRecords: 0 [2] NoRecords: 94 [2]
Security Info:
UsageType: DataCenter/WebHosting/Transit [3] hosting - high probability [C] hosting [0 7 9 A]
CompanyType: isp [7 A] hosting [0]
IsCloudProvider: Yes [7 D]
IsDatacenter: Yes [0 A C] No [1 5 6 8]
IsMobile: No [5 A C] Yes [E]
IsProxy: No [0 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E]
IsVpn: No [0 1 6 7 A C D E]
IsTorExit: No [1 7 D]
IsTorExit: No [1 7 D]
IsCrawler: No [9 A B E]
IsAnonymous: No [1 6 7 8 D]
IsAttacker: No [7 8 D]
IsAbuser: No [7 8 A C D E]
IsThreat: No [7 8 C D]
IsRelay: No [0 7 8 C D]
IsBogon: No [7 8 A C D]
IsBot: No [E]
DNS-BlackList: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 6(Blacklisted) 18(Other)
IPV6:
Security Score:
FraudScore: 0 [1]
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.003 (Low) [A]
CompannyAbuseScore: 0.8164 (Very High) [A]
ThreatLevel: low [B]
Security Info:
UsageType: DataCenter/WebHosting/Transit [3] isp [A]
CompanyType: business [A]
IsCloudProvider: Yes [D]
IsDatacenter: No [1 A]
IsMobile: No [A]
IsProxy: No [1 A B D]
IsVpn: No [1 A D]
IsTor: No [1 3 A B D]
IsTorExit: No [1 D]
IsCrawler: No [A] Yes [B]
IsAnonymous: No [1 D]
IsAttacker: No [D]
IsAbuser: Yes [A] No [D]
IsThreat: No [D]
IsRelay: No [D]
IsBogon: No [A D]
DNS-BlackList: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 0(Blacklisted) 314(Other)
Google search feasibility: YES
Email Port Detection
Platform SMTP SMTPS POP3 POP3S IMAP IMAPS
LocalPort ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
QQ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
163 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sohu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yandex ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Gmail ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Outlook ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Office365 ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yahoo ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailCOM ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
MailRU ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘
AOL ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
GMX ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sina ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ Looking Glass
https://aeza.net/looking-glass
Test Files: 10MB 100MB 1GB 10GB
Global Latency Tests
Query: ping 82.117.87.181, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 82.117.87.181 – /24 AS216246 RU-AEZA-AS Aeza – Russia, Moscow, Moscow [hosting]
CloudFlare Internet Tests
PageSpeed Insights
GTmetrix Performance
Admin Control Panel
Server Pricing
Official Website: https://www.aéza.net
Coupon
The merchant did not provide
Conclusion
Benchmarking with Geekbench 6 revealed decent single and multi-core scores of 3134 and 5472, respectively. Memory performance testing showed solid read speeds exceeding 10GB/s, while write speeds reached nearly 4GB/s. Disk performance was also respectable, with sequential read/write speeds reaching over 3GB/s for larger block sizes and maintaining consistent IOPS for smaller blocks using fio. The YABS benchmark completed relatively quickly, further indicating a responsive system.
Network testing with iperf3 showed varied results depending on the location of the test server. Connections to London and New York exhibited good speeds, reaching multi-gigabit levels. However, connections to other locations like Singapore and Sao Paulo were significantly slower, suggesting potential network bottlenecks or routing issues. IPv6 performance was also tested, revealing a similar pattern with varying speeds depending on the destination.
Streaming service accessibility tests revealed limited usability. While TVBAnywhere+ worked, popular platforms like Netflix, Disney+, and Amazon Prime Video were inaccessible. This suggests the server’s IP address might be flagged or geo-restricted. Email port testing, however, showed broad compatibility with various providers, indicating no significant outbound port restrictions. Finally, IP quality checks flagged a slightly elevated ASN abuse score for IPv4, but overall the server didn’t appear to be blacklisted.
In conclusion, the Aéza MSKs-2 server demonstrates reasonable processing, memory, and disk performance. However, the inconsistent network performance and limited streaming service accessibility raise concerns. Users considering this server should prioritize thorough network testing to their target audience and consider the implications of the streaming service limitations.
Official Website: https://www.aéza.net
Related Posts
Lets Hosting is a hosting media powered by human+AI and offers a wide range of information and resources for anyone looking for web hosting solutions. From VPS to dedicated servers, LetsHosting.com provides guides and reviews on various hosting options to help people make informed decisions about their hosting needs.
