TensorDock United States Dallas Intel Xeon Platinum 8470 Cloud Virtual Machine Test and Review
We tested the TensorDock Dallas Xeon Platinum 8470 cloud server, featuring a powerful processor, 2 cores, 8GB RAM, a 20GB SSD, and a 10Gbps network connection. Our benchmark tests revealed impressive results, particularly in disk and network performance.
About TensorDock
TensorDock is a dynamic and innovative hosting provider that has been making waves in the industry since its inception. Focusing on delivering high-performance, affordable, and scalable cloud solutions, TensorDock has quickly become a go-to choice for businesses, developers, and individuals alike. This post will delve into what makes TensorDock stand out in the competitive hosting landscape and why it might be the right choice for your hosting needs.
First and foremost, TensorDock offers a range of hosting options designed to cater to various requirements. The company’s flagship offering is its Elastic Cloud Servers, which provide powerful virtual private servers (VPS) running on premium hardware. With configurations starting at just $2.2 per month for 1 vCPU and 1 GB of RAM, TensorDock ensures that even budget-conscious users can access high-performance hosting solutions.
One of the standout features of TensorDock is its focus on performance. The company’s servers are built on Zen 3 EPYC processors, which are known for their high efficiency and processing power. This means that users can expect fast and reliable performance, even under heavy workloads. Whether you’re running a high-traffic website, an intensive application, or simply need a reliable server for your projects, TensorDock has the infrastructure to support your needs.
Official Website: https://www.TensorDock.com
BasicBench: Server Profile, I/O Speed, Upload and Download Speed
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8470
CPU Cores : 2 @ 2000.084 MHz
CPU Cache : 16384 KB
AES-NI : ✓ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✓ Enabled
Total Disk : 19.3 GB (4.0 GB Used)
Total Mem : 7.8 GB (316.8 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 14 min
Load average : 0.09, 0.34, 0.35
OS : Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.15.0-113-generic
TCP CC : bbr
Virtualization : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✓ Online / ✗ Offline
Organization : AS46082 Voltage Park, Inc.
Location : Dallas / US
Region : Texas
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O Speed(1st run) : 773 MB/s
I/O Speed(2nd run) : 742 MB/s
I/O Speed(3rd run) : 772 MB/s
I/O Speed(average) : 762.3 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Speedtest.net 4924.89 Mbps 6273.76 Mbps 15.11 ms
Los Angeles, US 2628.71 Mbps 14949.38 Mbps 32.93 ms
Dallas, US 13320.21 Mbps 17615.18 Mbps 1.96 ms
Montreal, CA 765.05 Mbps 934.81 Mbps 41.97 ms
Amsterdam, NL 742.14 Mbps 7000.41 Mbps 110.52 ms
Shanghai, CN 379.46 Mbps 3632.31 Mbps 212.46 ms
Mumbai, IN 325.82 Mbps 3178.57 Mbps 244.20 ms
Singapore, SG 165.24 Mbps 607.86 Mbps 211.11 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Finished in : 3 min 57 sec
Timestamp : 2024-11-02 00:18:29 UTC
YabsBench: Disk Speed, iperf3 Network Speed, Geekbench 6 Benchmark
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 18 minutes
Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8470
CPU cores : 2 @ 2000.084 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 7.8 GiB
Swap : 0.0 KiB
Disk : 19.3 GiB
Distro : Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS
Kernel : 5.15.0-113-generic
VM Type : QEMU
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP : Int18, Inc.
ASN : AS46082 Voltage Park, Inc.
Host : Voltage Park, Inc.
Location : Dallas, Texas (TX)
Country : United States
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 320.88 MB/s (80.2k) | 2.28 GB/s (35.7k)
Write | 321.72 MB/s (80.4k) | 2.30 GB/s (35.9k)
Total | 642.60 MB/s (160.6k) | 4.58 GB/s (71.7k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 2.77 GB/s (5.4k) | 2.09 GB/s (2.0k)
Write | 2.92 GB/s (5.7k) | 2.23 GB/s (2.1k)
Total | 5.70 GB/s (11.1k) | 4.32 GB/s (4.2k)
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 1.43 Gbits/sec | 1.63 Gbits/sec | 110 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 1.33 Gbits/sec | 1.53 Gbits/sec | 118 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 729 Mbits/sec | 496 Mbits/sec | 194 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 692 Mbits/sec | 874 Mbits/sec | 201 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 5.52 Gbits/sec | 5.32 Gbits/sec | 32.3 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 4.34 Gbits/sec | 2.98 Gbits/sec | 40.5 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 1.11 Gbits/sec | 1.26 Gbits/sec | 133 ms
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 1481
Multi Core | 2847
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8608248
YABS completed in 10 min 17 sec
UnixBench: CPU Performance, A Score Higher is Better
Benchmark Run: Sat Nov 02 2024 00:30:45 - 00:58:45
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 44584749.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 6856.4 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4676.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1630797.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 425581.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3830362.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2374924.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 77214.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 10865.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 13238.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2773.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1839107.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 44584749.9 3820.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6856.4 1246.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 4676.0 1087.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1630797.4 4118.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 425581.1 2571.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3830362.2 6604.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2374924.8 1909.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 77214.1 193.0
Process Creation 126.0 10865.0 862.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 13238.9 3122.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2773.2 4622.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1839107.9 1226.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1886.9
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Nov 02 2024 00:58:45 - 01:26:47
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 88468425.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 13712.2 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 8382.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2654522.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 741133.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 6744143.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 4571155.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 539294.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 28147.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 20648.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2882.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3042252.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 88468425.7 7580.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 13712.2 2493.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 8382.7 1949.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 2654522.4 6703.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 741133.4 4478.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 6744143.3 11627.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4571155.4 3674.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 539294.3 1348.2
Process Creation 126.0 28147.8 2234.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 20648.5 4869.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2882.6 4804.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3042252.6 2028.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 3707.9
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Looking Glass
None
Global Latency Test
Query: ping 147.185.40.117, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 147.185.40.117 – ARIN /23 AS46082 VOLTAGEPARK – United States [residential]
Global Node Test
## CDN Speedtest
CacheFly : 397.15 MiB/s | 3177.18 Mbps | ping 2.553ms
Gdrive : 5.56 KiB/s | 0.04 Mbps | ping 3.060ms
## North America Speedtest
Softlayer, Washington, USA : 0 B/s | N/A | ping 33.834ms
Vultr, New Jersey, USA : 344.24 KiB/s | 2.69 Mbps | ping 57.231ms
Vultr, Seattle, USA : 944.28 KiB/s | 7.38 Mbps | ping 63.318ms
Vultr, Dallas, USA : 55.24 MiB/s | 441.96 Mbps | ping 1.946ms
Vultr, Los Angeles, USA : 29.81 MiB/s | 238.45 Mbps | ping 48.889ms
Ramnode, New York, USA : 53.53 MiB/s | 428.23 Mbps | ping 45.837ms
Ramnode, Atlanta, USA : 90.33 MiB/s | 722.64 Mbps | ping 19.829ms
## Europe Speedtest
Vultr, London, UK : 756.55 KiB/s | 5.91 Mbps | ping 108.528ms
LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany : 30.81 KiB/s | 0.24 Mbps | ping 119.507ms
Hetzner, Germany : 0 B/s | N/A | ping 120.195ms
Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL : 19.51 MiB/s | 156.11 Mbps | ping 118.688ms
Vultr, Amsterdam, NL : 66.37 KiB/s | 0.52 Mbps | ping 166.935ms
EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden : 304 B/s | N/A | ping 130.531ms
OVH, Roubaix, France : 428 B/s | N/A | ping 113.550ms
Online, France : 14.92 MiB/s | 119.35 Mbps | ping 109.645ms
Prometeus, Milan, Italy : 206 B/s | N/A | ping 127.696ms
## Exotic Speedtest
Sydney, Australia : 7.23 MiB/s | 57.85 Mbps | ping 203.004ms
Lagoon, New Caledonia : 164 B/s | N/A | ping 214.335ms
Hosteasy, Moldova : 6.59 MiB/s | 52.75 Mbps | ping 162.979ms
Prima, Argentina : 402.96 KiB/s | 3.15 Mbps | ping error!
## Asia Speedtest
SoftLayer, Singapore : 0 B/s | N/A | ping 204.245ms
Linode, Tokyo, Japan : 13.40 MiB/s | 107.17 Mbps | ping 154.723ms
Linode, Singapore : 6.07 MiB/s | 48.57 Mbps | ping 228.654ms
Vultr, Tokyo, Japan : 12.76 MiB/s | 102.05 Mbps | ping 150.140ms
Benchmark finished in 95 seconds
CloudFlare Internet Test
None
PageSpeed Insights
None
GTmetrix Performance
None
Media Unlock Test
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Yes (Region: US)
Disney+: Yes (Region: US)
Netflix: Yes (Region: US)
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: US)
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: US)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
Spotify Registration: Yes (Region: US)
Instagram Licensed Audio: Yes
OneTrust Region: US [Unknown]
iQyi Oversea Region: US
Bing Region: US
YouTube CDN: Washington DC
Netflix Preferred CDN: Los Angeles, CA
ChatGPT: Yes
Google Gemini: Yes (Region: USA)
Wikipedia Editability: Yes
Google Search CAPTCHA Free: Yes
Steam Currency: USD
---Forum---
Reddit: Yes
=======================================
Admin Control Panel
Server Pricing
Official Website: https://www.TensorDock.com
Coupon
The merchant did not provide
Conclusion
The server’s average I/O speed hit 762.3 MB/s, placing it firmly in the “good” category for disk performance. Yabs benchmark further confirmed this with excellent read/write speeds, exceeding 2GB/s even with smaller block sizes. This indicates the SSD is capable of handling demanding tasks efficiently. Network speeds were equally impressive, with the Dallas location showing download speeds reaching nearly 18Gbps, showcasing the low-latency advantage of a local connection.
The Geekbench 6 single-core score of 1481 landed in the “good” range, indicating solid processing power for single-threaded applications. The multi-core score of 2847 reflects the server’s two-core configuration, demonstrating adequate performance for multitasking.
UnixBench results further highlighted the server’s strengths. The system consistently achieved high index scores across various tests, including file copy, pipe throughput, and shell scripts, indicating robust performance in real-world scenarios. The substantial increase in performance when running two parallel copies of the tests underscores the server’s ability to handle concurrent processes effectively.
In conclusion, the TensorDock Dallas Xeon Platinum 8470 server offers a compelling combination of excellent disk and network performance. While the CPU core count might limit highly demanding multi-threaded applications, its overall performance makes it a strong contender for various workloads, especially those requiring fast storage and network access.
Official Website: https://www.TensorDock.com
Related Posts
