SurferCloud Taipei UHost AMD EPYC Enterprise-level Cloud Computing Server Test and Review
We tested the SurferCloud Taipei UHost Enterprise server, an AMD EPYC-powered machine with 2 cores, 4GB RAM, and a 40GB SSD. Our benchmark tests revealed some performance limitations. The I/O speed averaged just 139.3 MB/s, indicating poor disk performance for tasks requiring frequent read/write operations. The 20Mbps internet port also proved to be a bottleneck, as our network tests showed download speeds capped around 50Mbps, even with low latency to nearby Asian locations.
About SurferCloud
SurferCloud is a dynamic and innovative hosting provider that has been making waves in the industry since its inception. Focusing on delivering high-performance, affordable, and scalable cloud solutions, SurferCloud has quickly become a go-to choice for businesses, developers, and individuals alike. This post will delve into what makes SurferCloud stand out in the competitive hosting landscape and why it might be the right choice for your hosting needs.
First and foremost, SurferCloud offers various hosting options designed to cater to various requirements. The company’s flagship offering is its Elastic Cloud Servers, which provide powerful virtual private servers (VPS) running on premium hardware. With configurations starting at just $2.2 per month for 1 vCPU and 1 GB of RAM, SurferCloud ensures that even budget-conscious users can access high-performance hosting solutions. This affordability, combined with the robust performance of their servers, makes SurferCloud an attractive option for a wide range of applications.
One of the standout features of SurferCloud is its focus on performance. The company’s servers are built on Zen 3 EPYC processors, known for their high efficiency and processing power. This means that users can expect fast and reliable performance, even under heavy workloads. Whether you’re running a high-traffic website, a resource-intensive application, or simply need a reliable server for your projects, SurferCloud has the infrastructure to support your needs.
Official Website: https://www.SurferCloud.com
BasicBench: Server Profile, I/O Speed, Upload and Download Speed
CPU Model : AMD EPYC Processor
CPU Cores : 2 @ 2899.998 MHz
CPU Cache : 512 KB
AES-NI : ✓ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✗ Disabled
Total Disk : 39.2 GB (2.1 GB Used)
Total Mem : 3.8 GB (258.0 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 16 min
Load average : 0.04, 0.12, 0.14
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 11
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.10.0-23-amd64
TCP CC : bbr
Virtualization : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✓ Online / ✗ Offline
Organization : AS142002 Scloud Pte Ltd
Location : Taipei / TW
Region : Taiwan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O Speed(1st run) : 140 MB/s
I/O Speed(2nd run) : 139 MB/s
I/O Speed(3rd run) : 139 MB/s
I/O Speed(average) : 139.3 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Speedtest.net 19.60 Mbps 47.92 Mbps 0.79 ms
Los Angeles, US 18.94 Mbps 52.28 Mbps 239.23 ms
Dallas, US 18.95 Mbps 52.89 Mbps 242.41 ms
Montreal, CA 18.83 Mbps 52.89 Mbps 244.71 ms
Amsterdam, NL 21.02 Mbps 52.67 Mbps 201.34 ms
Shanghai, CN 20.20 Mbps 52.00 Mbps 133.65 ms
Hongkong, CN 19.25 Mbps 48.47 Mbps 50.38 ms
Mumbai, IN 20.23 Mbps 51.45 Mbps 251.01 ms
Singapore, SG 19.58 Mbps 49.01 Mbps 48.93 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Finished in : 5 min 5 sec
Timestamp : 2024-11-01 08:32:22 CST
YabsBench: Disk Speed, iperf3 Network Speed, Geekbench 6 Benchmark
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 25 minutes
Processor : AMD EPYC Processor
CPU cores : 2 @ 2899.998 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM : 3.8 GiB
Swap : 0.0 KiB
Disk : 39.2 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Kernel : 5.10.0-23-amd64
VM Type : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP : Scloud Pte Ltd
ASN : AS142002 Scloud Pte Ltd
Host : Scloud Pte Ltd
Location : Taipei, Taipei City (TPE)
Country : Taiwan
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 5.68 MB/s (1.4k) | 67.43 MB/s (1.0k)
Write | 5.69 MB/s (1.4k) | 67.87 MB/s (1.0k)
Total | 11.38 MB/s (2.8k) | 135.30 MB/s (2.1k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 65.51 MB/s (127) | 64.70 MB/s (63)
Write | 68.87 MB/s (134) | 69.57 MB/s (67)
Total | 134.39 MB/s (261) | 134.28 MB/s (130)
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 18.5 Mbits/sec | 47.7 Mbits/sec | 268 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 16.9 Mbits/sec | 46.7 Mbits/sec | 242 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 18.8 Mbits/sec | 46.9 Mbits/sec | 282 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 20.3 Mbits/sec | 51.4 Mbits/sec | 84.2 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 19.8 Mbits/sec | 50.6 Mbits/sec | 141 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 19.3 Mbits/sec | 46.4 Mbits/sec | 193 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 17.9 Mbits/sec | 47.5 Mbits/sec | 293 ms
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 1262
Multi Core | 2210
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8590394
YABS completed in 14 min 52 sec
UnixBench: CPU Performance, A Score Higher is Better
Benchmark Run: Fri Nov 01 2024 08:52:00 - 09:19:59
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 42407334.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7441.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5560.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 999972.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 280743.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2205783.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1849939.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 195430.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 11590.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 13818.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2228.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2019702.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 42407334.4 3633.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7441.3 1353.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 5560.4 1293.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 999972.0 2525.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 280743.0 1696.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2205783.3 3803.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1849939.6 1487.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 195430.8 488.6
Process Creation 126.0 11590.1 919.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 13818.5 3259.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2228.3 3713.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2019702.5 1346.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1796.2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Nov 01 2024 09:19:59 - 09:47:59
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 81703626.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 14861.1 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 9693.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1353386.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 257300.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3213173.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 3615486.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 404943.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 19480.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 17716.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2262.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3256997.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 81703626.7 7001.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 14861.1 2702.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 9693.2 2254.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1353386.3 3417.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 257300.2 1554.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3213173.1 5540.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3615486.1 2906.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 404943.5 1012.4
Process Creation 126.0 19480.5 1546.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 17716.5 4178.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2262.9 3771.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3256997.9 2171.3
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2760.0
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Looking Glass
Test IPv4: 165.154.243.34
Global Latency Test
Query: ping 165.154.243.34, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 165.154.243.34 – APNIC /24 AS142002 SCLOUDPTELTD-AS – Taiwan, Taipei City, Taipei [hosting]
Global Node Test
## CDN Speedtest
CacheFly : 81 B/s | N/A | ping 26.413ms
Gdrive : 3.48 KiB/s | 0.03 Mbps | ping 1.262ms
## North America Speedtest
Softlayer, Washington, USA : 0 B/s | N/A | ping 202.163ms
Vultr, New Jersey, USA : 176.65 KiB/s | 1.38 Mbps | ping 225.256ms
Vultr, Seattle, USA : 373.92 KiB/s | 2.92 Mbps | ping 157.144ms
Vultr, Dallas, USA : 2.18 MiB/s | 17.45 Mbps | ping 175.914ms
Vultr, Los Angeles, USA : 3.41 MiB/s | 27.31 Mbps | ping 144.724ms
Ramnode, New York, USA : 3.89 MiB/s | 31.16 Mbps | ping 197.027ms
Ramnode, Atlanta, USA : 4.12 MiB/s | 32.95 Mbps | ping 193.140ms
## Europe Speedtest
Vultr, London, UK : 165.37 KiB/s | 1.29 Mbps | ping 263.859ms
LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany : 23.15 KiB/s | 0.18 Mbps | ping 207.638ms
Hetzner, Germany : 0 B/s | N/A | ping 209.175ms
Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL : 2.77 MiB/s | 22.18 Mbps | ping 211.678ms
Vultr, Amsterdam, NL : 34.09 KiB/s | 0.27 Mbps | ping 306.663ms
EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden : 263 B/s | N/A | ping 280.485ms
OVH, Roubaix, France : 194 B/s | N/A | ping 277.095ms
Online, France : 3.60 MiB/s | 28.79 Mbps | ping 217.670ms
Prometeus, Milan, Italy : 184 B/s | N/A | ping 283.065ms
## Exotic Speedtest
Sydney, Australia : 5.42 MiB/s | 43.32 Mbps | ping 143.076ms
Lagoon, New Caledonia : 316 B/s | N/A | ping 167.422ms
Hosteasy, Moldova : 1.66 MiB/s | 13.27 Mbps | ping 230.842ms
Prima, Argentina : 150.70 KiB/s | 1.18 Mbps | ping error!
## Asia Speedtest
SoftLayer, Singapore : 0 B/s | N/A | ping 49.736ms
Linode, Tokyo, Japan : 6.61 MiB/s | 52.92 Mbps | ping 34.944ms
Linode, Singapore : 5.92 MiB/s | 47.33 Mbps | ping 46.703ms
Vultr, Tokyo, Japan : 6.39 MiB/s | 51.08 Mbps | ping 32.971ms
Benchmark finished in 108 seconds
CloudFlare Internet Test
PageSpeed Insights
GTmetrix Performance
Media Unlock Test
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Yes (Region: TW)
Disney+: No
Netflix: Yes (Region: SG)
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: SG)
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: SG)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
Spotify Registration: No
Instagram Licensed Audio: No
OneTrust Region: TW [Taipei City]
iQyi Oversea Region: SG
Bing Region: TW
YouTube CDN: Taipei
Netflix Preferred CDN: Failed (CDN IP Not Found)
ChatGPT: Yes
Google Gemini: Yes (Region: SGP)
Wikipedia Editability: No
Google Search CAPTCHA Free: Yes
Steam Currency: TWD
---Forum---
Reddit: Yes
=======================================
Admin Control Panel
Server Pricing
Official Website: https://www.SurferCloud.com
Coupon
The merchant did not provide
Conclusion
The Geekbench 6 benchmark results offered a brighter spot. A single-core score of 1262 and a multi-core score of 2210 suggest decent processing power for a server of this configuration. This performance level should handle basic web hosting tasks and light application workloads effectively. However, more demanding applications or high-traffic websites might struggle.
Yabs benchmark results further highlighted the storage limitations. The mixed read/write speeds, especially with smaller block sizes, reinforce the I/O bottleneck identified earlier. This could impact database performance and overall server responsiveness under load.
UnixBench results provided a comprehensive look at CPU performance. The server performed admirably in tests like Dhrystone and Double-Precision Whetstone, demonstrating good single-threaded performance. However, the relatively low scores in file copy tests, especially with smaller buffer sizes, again point towards the storage subsystem being a limiting factor. The overall UnixBench index score of 2760 with two parallel test copies confirms decent multi-core performance.
Finally, the limited RAM (4GB) will likely constrain the server’s ability to handle multiple concurrent processes or memory-intensive applications. While suitable for basic web hosting or small projects, resource-intensive tasks will quickly exhaust the available memory.
In conclusion, the SurferCloud Taipei UHost Enterprise server offers adequate processing power for its price point, thanks to the AMD EPYC processor. However, the slow I/O, limited RAM, and 20Mbps internet port significantly restrict its performance potential. This server is best suited for individuals or small businesses with low-traffic websites or lightweight applications. Users with more demanding requirements should consider a higher-tier server with improved storage, RAM, and network bandwidth.
Official Website: https://www.SurferCloud.com
Related Posts
