OneProvider Belgium Brussels AMD EPYC General Purpose Instance Test and Review
We recently put the OneProvider General Purpose Instance in Brussels through intensive tests to gauge its performance across various benchmarks. This server, equipped with an AMD EPYC Processor, features 2 CPU cores, 4 GB of RAM, 20 GB SSD storage, a 1 Gbps internet port, along with 3 TB of data transfer capacity per month, and both an IPv4 and an IPv6 address.
About OneProvider
OneProvider offers a service known as OneCloud. This service is a KVM-based virtualization infrastructure with three versions: General Purpose, High Performance, and Storage. Each version caters to different needs and use cases, making OneProvider a versatile choice for various projects.
Let’s start with General Purpose Instances. These instances, powered by SSD, are fast, flexible, and easy to set up. They come in various sizes, ensuring you find the best instance for your needs. Whether you’re hosting a moderate-traffic web server, a small database, or for testing purposes, General Purpose Instances are perfect.
Next, they have High Performance Instances. These instances use Intel Enterprise, AMD EPYC CPUs, and enterprise-grade NVMe. They are bigger, faster, and scalable. High-performance instances are your go-to if you have larger projects, databases, or media streaming needs.
Finally, they also have Storage Instances. Designed for storing large amounts of data, these instances feature high-capacity hard drives and unmetered bandwidth. With redundant disks set, they are perfect for safely hosting or storing all your media assets.
OneProvider Instances has features tailored for you. They offer hourly billing, ensuring you only pay for your active VM. IPv6 is available for future-proofing, streamlined addressing, and enhanced security. The image feature allows you to duplicate your VM or quickly back up. You can add storage to your instance anytime if you run out of space.
Official Website: https://oneprovider.com
BasicBench: Server Profile, I/O Speed, Upload and Download Speed
CPU Model : AMD EPYC Processor
CPU Cores : 4 @ 2099.984 MHz
CPU Cache : 8192 KB
AES-NI : ✓ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✗ Disabled
Total Disk : 19.8 GB (1.9 GB Used)
Total Mem : 1.9 GB (201.6 MB Used)
Total Swap : 511.0 MB (12.0 KB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 8 min
Load average : 0.53, 0.43, 0.21
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 11
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.10.0-8-amd64
TCP CC : bbr
Virtualization : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✓ Online / ✓ Online
Organization : AS9009 M247 Europe SRL
Location : Brussels / BE
Region : Brussels Capital
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O Speed(1st run) : 102 MB/s
I/O Speed(2nd run) : 106 MB/s
I/O Speed(3rd run) : 103 MB/s
I/O Speed(average) : 103.7 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Speedtest.net 877.50 Mbps 904.23 Mbps 0.51 ms
Los Angeles, US 577.83 Mbps 921.27 Mbps 140.49 ms
Dallas, US 723.32 Mbps 923.36 Mbps 112.95 ms
Montreal, CA 795.41 Mbps 924.28 Mbps 93.89 ms
Amsterdam, NL 869.31 Mbps 932.25 Mbps 26.04 ms
Shanghai, CN 276.51 Mbps 845.25 Mbps 257.19 ms
Hongkong, CN 507.21 Mbps 935.52 Mbps 159.54 ms
Mumbai, IN 639.76 Mbps 918.42 Mbps 123.67 ms
Singapore, SG 63.81 Mbps 15.21 Mbps 329.40 ms
Tokyo, JP 326.46 Mbps 929.52 Mbps 247.96 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Finished in : 5 min 30 sec
Timestamp : 2024-05-06 20:13:58 EDT
YabsBench: Disk Speed, iperf3 Network Speed, Geekbench 6 Benchmark
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 13 minutes
Processor : AMD EPYC Processor
CPU cores : 4 @ 2099.984 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM : 1.9 GiB
Swap : 511.0 MiB
Disk : 19.3 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Kernel : 5.10.0-8-amd64
VM Type : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP : ONEPROVIDER
ASN : AS9009 M247 Europe SRL
Host : Oneprovider.com
Location : New York, New York (NY)
Country : United States
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 104.95 MB/s (26.2k) | 147.74 MB/s (2.3k)
Write | 105.23 MB/s (26.3k) | 148.52 MB/s (2.3k)
Total | 210.18 MB/s (52.5k) | 296.27 MB/s (4.6k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 145.84 MB/s (284) | 155.61 MB/s (151)
Write | 153.59 MB/s (299) | 165.98 MB/s (162)
Total | 299.44 MB/s (583) | 321.59 MB/s (313)
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 918 Mbits/sec | 918 Mbits/sec | 14.7 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 857 Mbits/sec | 895 Mbits/sec | --
Telia | Helsinki, FI (10G) | busy | busy | 27.4 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 802 Mbits/sec | 868 Mbits/sec | 94.1 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 263 Mbits/sec | 550 Mbits/sec | 301 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 623 Mbits/sec | 841 Mbits/sec | 144 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 847 Mbits/sec | 887 Mbits/sec | 77.9 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 685 Mbits/sec | 832 Mbits/sec | 168 ms
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 882 Mbits/sec | 908 Mbits/sec | 10.5 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | busy | busy | --
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 806 Mbits/sec | 864 Mbits/sec | 94.1 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 329 Mbits/sec | 551 Mbits/sec | 297 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 589 Mbits/sec | 789 Mbits/sec | 144 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 824 Mbits/sec | 860 Mbits/sec | 78.1 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 682 Mbits/sec | 828 Mbits/sec | 152 ms
Geekbench 6 test failed. Run manually to determine cause.
YABS completed in 20 min 47 sec
UnixBench: CPU Performance, A Score Higher is Better
Benchmark Run: Mon May 06 2024 23:04:02 - 23:32:11
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 28504250.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4604.6 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2239.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 230968.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 61418.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 732425.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 381076.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 48357.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 4355.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5749.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1770.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 226074.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 28504250.3 2442.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4604.6 837.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 2239.0 520.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 230968.1 583.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 61418.3 371.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 732425.7 1262.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 381076.5 306.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 48357.1 120.9
Process Creation 126.0 4355.2 345.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5749.9 1356.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1770.2 2950.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 226074.5 150.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 601.6
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon May 06 2024 23:32:11 - 00:00:22
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 110604140.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 18348.4 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 6726.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 390922.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 106523.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1278430.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1423715.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 235402.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 16947.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 14883.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1987.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 793028.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 110604140.1 9477.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 18348.4 3336.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 6726.5 1564.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 390922.1 987.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 106523.5 643.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1278430.0 2204.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1423715.8 1144.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 235402.4 588.5
Process Creation 126.0 16947.0 1345.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 14883.6 3510.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1987.7 3312.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 793028.4 528.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1642.6
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Looking Glass
None
Global Node Test
## CDN Speedtest
CacheFly : 79.18 MiB/s | 633.41 Mbps | ping 29.358ms
Gdrive : 6.02 KiB/s | 0.05 Mbps | ping 3.949ms
## North America Speedtest
Softlayer, Washington, USA : 6.11 MiB/s | 48.89 Mbps | ping 89.912ms
SoftLayer, San Jose, USA : 0 B/s | N/A | ping error!
SoftLayer, Dallas, USA : 0 B/s | N/A | ping error!
Vultr, New Jersey, USA : 758.90 KiB/s | 5.93 Mbps | ping 80.419ms
Vultr, Seattle, USA : 14.05 MiB/s | 112.44 Mbps | ping 137.446ms
Vultr, Dallas, USA : 18.24 MiB/s | 145.92 Mbps | ping 115.660ms
Vultr, Los Angeles, USA : 12.86 MiB/s | 102.90 Mbps | ping 146.863ms
Ramnode, New York, USA : 29.50 MiB/s | 235.98 Mbps | ping 77.402ms
Ramnode, Atlanta, USA : 24.91 MiB/s | 199.30 Mbps | ping 92.244ms
## Europe Speedtest
Vultr, London, UK : 97.37 MiB/s | 778.97 Mbps | ping 10.284ms
LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany : 323.22 KiB/s | 2.53 Mbps | ping 12.392ms
Hetzner, Germany : 2.02 KiB/s | 0.02 Mbps | ping 12.982ms
Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL : 77.41 MiB/s | 619.27 Mbps | ping 10.544ms
Vultr, Amsterdam, NL : 99.01 MiB/s | 792.08 Mbps | ping 4.212ms
EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden : 1.67 KiB/s | 0.01 Mbps | ping 29.173ms
OVH, Roubaix, France : 3.68 KiB/s | 0.03 Mbps | ping 10.141ms
Online, France : 96.43 MiB/s | 771.43 Mbps | ping 12.828ms
Prometeus, Milan, Italy : 2.23 KiB/s | 0.02 Mbps | ping 21.683ms
## Exotic Speedtest
Sydney, Australia : 2.06 MiB/s | 16.47 Mbps | ping 324.913ms
Lagoon, New Caledonia : 279 B/s | N/A | ping 342.600ms
Hosteasy, Moldova : 41.08 MiB/s | 328.68 Mbps | ping 52.780ms
Prima, Argentina : 267.26 KiB/s | 2.09 Mbps | ping error!
## Asia Speedtest
SoftLayer, Singapore : 209.18 KiB/s | 1.63 Mbps | ping 256.024ms
Linode, Tokyo, Japan : 5.62 MiB/s | 44.93 Mbps | ping 248.709ms
Linode, Singapore : 2.94 MiB/s | 23.56 Mbps | ping 303.832ms
Vultr, Tokyo, Japan : 5.79 MiB/s | 46.33 Mbps | ping 244.293ms
Benchmark finished in 115 seconds
Global Latency Test
Query: ping 185.213.22.50, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 185.213.22.50 – RIPENCC /24 AS9009 M247 – Belgium, Brussels Capital, Brussels
Media Unlock Test
** Test Starts At: Mon 06 May 2024 08:05:56 PM EDT
** Checking Results Under IPv4
--------------------------------
** Your Network Provider: M247 Europe (185.213.*.*)
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: No
HotStar: No
Disney+: No
Netflix: Originals Only
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: RO)
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: BE)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
iQyi Oversea Region: INTL
Viu.com: No
YouTube CDN: Frankfurt
Netflix Preferred CDN: Brussels
Spotify Registration: No
Steam Currency: EUR
ChatGPT: Yes
Bing Region: BE
Instagram Licensed Audio: Yes
=======================================
** Checking Results Under IPv6
--------------------------------
** Your Network Provider: M247 Europe (2a11:840:2:*:*)
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Failed (Network Connection)
HotStar: No
Disney+: No
Netflix: Originals Only
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: RO)
Amazon Prime Video: Unsupported
TVBAnywhere+: Failed (Network Connection)
iQyi Oversea Region: Failed
Viu.com: Failed
YouTube CDN: Frankfurt
Netflix Preferred CDN: Brussels
Spotify Registration: No
Steam Currency: Failed (Network Connection)
ChatGPT: Failed
Bing Region: BE
Instagram Licensed Audio: Yes
=======================================
Testing Done!CloudFlare Internet Test
PageSpeed Insights
GTmetrix Performance
Admin Control Panel
OneProvider offers OnePanel, a tool that allows you to easily manage your servers, billing, support requests, monitoring, and administrative tasks. You can upgrade your plan, change location on the fly, and run every possible remote operation in just a few clicks.
Server Pricing
OneProvider offers easy-to-understand pricing. The prices vary based on the type of instance and the resources of your virtual machine. You can check out the detailed pricing on their website.
Official Website: https://oneprovider.com
Payments
OneProvider accepts various payment methods. They currently accept PayPal, AliPay, and Digital Wallet (which includes Apple Pay, Google Pay, and Microsoft Pay). They also accept all major credit card payments. For invoices larger than $500, they accept SWIFT bank transfers. This variety ensures that you can choose the payment method that suits you best.
Flexibility in Choosing Your Payment Method
OneProvider offers flexibility in their services and how you pay for them. You can choose your method of payment for each invoice. If your preferred payment method changes over time, you can easily switch to a different one.
Convenient Billing
OneProvider prides itself on its convenient billing. They offer hourly billing for their OneCloud instances. This ensures you only pay for your active virtual machine. An invoice summary is sent on the 1st of every month with a full outline of your usage costs for the previous month.
Coupon
The merchant did not provide
Customer Support
OneProvider’s customer support is as versatile and comprehensive as its services. Whether you prefer email, social media, a dedicated panel, or a good old-fashioned phone call, OneProvider has a channel for you. So, rest assured, with OneProvider, you’re in good hands!
Multiple Channels of Communication
OneProvider offers multiple channels for customers to reach out to them. You can contact them via email at [email protected]. They also have a contact form on their website. OneProvider maintains active profiles on various platforms for those who prefer social media.
OnePanel™: Your Support Hub
OneProvider has a dedicated tool called OnePanel™. This tool is not just for managing your servers, billing, and administrative tasks. If you need to open a support or billing case regarding one of your existing services, you can do so directly through OnePanel™.
Phone Support
For those who prefer a more direct approach, OneProvider offers phone support. You can reach them at their head office at +1 (514) 286-0253. They also have a toll-free number, + 1 (800) 380-5112.
Conclusion
In our initial testing phase, the server’s I/O speeds were notably below standard, averaging only 103.7 MB/s across three runs, which is considered poor. However, the network performance was stronger, with high upload and download speeds across multiple global nodes – except for significantly lower speeds and higher latency in Singapore. The Global Node Test highlighted strong connectivity in European and North American regions, indicating robust network capabilities.
Further detailed testing with Yabs and UnixBench showcased a mixed bag in terms of performance. The disk read/write speeds across different block sizes were adequate but not impressive, peaking at 321.59 MB/s. Meanwhile, the UnixBench scores were more promising, indicating a high capacity for handling multiprocessing tasks efficiently, as highlighted by the superior scores when running four parallel copies of tests. Notably, the Geekbench 6 test failed to run, leaving a gap in our CPU performance assessment from this benchmark.
In conclusion, the OneProvider General Purpose Instance demonstrates robust networking performance, particularly in Western regions, but suffers from subpar disk I/O speeds that could impact data-intensive applications. The server’s capability to handle multiple processes simultaneously is a strong point, suggesting that it could be well-suited for environments where multitasking is a regular requirement. However, the failure of the Geekbench test indicates potential unknowns in raw CPU performance, which could require further investigation to provide a comprehensive assessment.
Official Website: https://oneprovider.com
Related Posts
