KhanWebHost United States Texas High-Performance KVM VPS Test and Review
Today, we’re closely examining the KhanWebHost Texas VPS server. It runs on a powerful Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 processor, boasting a configuration that includes 4 CPU cores, 6GB of RAM, 50GB of SSD storage, a 500 Mbps internet port, 1TB of bandwidth, and both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.
We put this server through its paces with a series of tests. First, we ran standard benchmarks like Basic Benchmark, Yabs, and Unix Benchmark to measure its core performance. Then, we checked its network capabilities globally with the Global Node Test and gauged its response times with the Global Ping Test.
We used the Media Unlock Test for media streaming to see what content it could access. We evaluated its connection quality with the CloudFlare Internet Test. Lastly, website speeds were tested with tools like PageSpeed Insights and GTmetrix Performance.
About KhanWebHost
KhanWebHost is a web hosting service provider serving its customers for many years. It offers various hosting options to meet the needs of virtually any site, making it an exceptional hosting company to consider.
KhanWebHost’s KVM VPS (Kernel-based Virtual Machine Virtual Private Server) is a popular choice among users for its performance and affordability.
KVM VPS is a type of hosting that provides users with dedicated resources on a server, ensuring that their websites or applications run smoothly and efficiently. This is particularly beneficial for websites with high-traffic or resource-intensive applications.
One of the key features of KhanWebHost’s KVM VPS is its impressive speed and quality protection. Users have praised the service for its reliability and performance. This is crucial for maintaining the accessibility and functionality of a website.
Another standout feature of KhanWebHost’s KVM VPS is its affordability. Despite offering high-quality services, KhanWebHost keeps its prices competitive, making it an excellent choice for users looking for reliable hosting without breaking the bank.
Official Website: https://www.KhanWebHost.com
BasicBench: Server Profile, I/O Speed, Upload and Download Speed
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz
CPU Cores : 4 @ 2199.996 MHz
CPU Cache : 56320 KB
AES-NI : ✓ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✓ Enabled
Total Disk : 49.1 GB (2.3 GB Used)
Total Mem : 7.6 GB (243.2 MB Used)
Total Swap : 1024.0 MB (0 Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 22 hour 27 min
Load average : 0.09, 0.05, 0.92
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 11
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.10.0-23-amd64
TCP CC : bbr
Virtualization : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✓ Online / ✓ Online
Organization : AS918 DFDB LLC
Location : Spring / US
Region : Texas
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O Speed(1st run) : 250 MB/s
I/O Speed(2nd run) : 247 MB/s
I/O Speed(3rd run) : 258 MB/s
I/O Speed(average) : 251.7 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Speedtest.net 290.58 Mbps 420.58 Mbps 1.04 ms
Los Angeles, US 292.50 Mbps 365.65 Mbps 38.54 ms
Dallas, US 290.63 Mbps 150.36 Mbps 6.98 ms
Montreal, CA 292.99 Mbps 302.47 Mbps 53.47 ms
Paris, FR 288.08 Mbps 433.63 Mbps 114.60 ms
Amsterdam, NL 269.58 Mbps 267.85 Mbps 120.02 ms
Shanghai, CN 160.82 Mbps 7.78 Mbps 208.11 ms
Chongqing, CN 2.40 Mbps 0.25 Mbps 232.26 ms
Mumbai, IN 213.14 Mbps 405.30 Mbps 252.09 ms
Singapore, SG 232.79 Mbps 449.74 Mbps 208.64 ms
Tokyo, JP 205.60 Mbps 269.97 Mbps 136.30 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Finished in : 5 min 35 sec
Timestamp : 2024-02-18 00:30:21 EST
YabsBench: Disk Speed, iperf3 Network Speed, Geekbench 6 Benchmark
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime : 0 days, 22 hours, 35 minutes
Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz
CPU cores : 4 @ 2199.996 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 7.6 GiB
Swap : 1024.0 MiB
Disk : 48.1 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Kernel : 5.10.0-23-amd64
VM Type : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP : Dfdb LLC
ASN : AS918 DFDB LLC
Host : KhanWebHost LTD
Location : Spring, Texas (TX)
Country : United States
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 29.27 MB/s (7.3k) | 146.68 MB/s (2.2k)
Write | 29.28 MB/s (7.3k) | 147.46 MB/s (2.3k)
Total | 58.56 MB/s (14.6k) | 294.15 MB/s (4.5k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 135.32 MB/s (264) | 288.78 MB/s (282)
Write | 142.51 MB/s (278) | 308.01 MB/s (300)
Total | 277.84 MB/s (542) | 596.79 MB/s (582)
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 269 Mbits/sec | 154 Mbits/sec | 107 ms
Scaleway | Paris, FR (10G) | 257 Mbits/sec | 381 Mbits/sec | 108 ms
NovoServe | North Holland, NL (40G) | busy | 374 Mbits/sec | 116 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 246 Mbits/sec | 197 Mbits/sec | 210 ms
Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 282 Mbits/sec | 281 Mbits/sec | 35.6 ms
Clouvider | Dallas, TX, US (10G) | 288 Mbits/sec | 400 Mbits/sec | 15.7 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 281 Mbits/sec | 218 Mbits/sec | 37.8 ms
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 267 Mbits/sec | 130 Mbits/sec | 106 ms
Scaleway | Paris, FR (10G) | 262 Mbits/sec | 372 Mbits/sec | 108 ms
NovoServe | North Holland, NL (40G) | 264 Mbits/sec | 375 Mbits/sec | 116 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 237 Mbits/sec | 180 Mbits/sec | 204 ms
Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 282 Mbits/sec | 271 Mbits/sec | 35.5 ms
Clouvider | Dallas, TX, US (10G) | 287 Mbits/sec | 361 Mbits/sec | 8.09 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 280 Mbits/sec | 202 Mbits/sec | 37.9 ms
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 565
Multi Core | 1860
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/4961534
YABS completed in 19 min 42 sec
UnixBench: CPU Performance, A score higher is better
Benchmark Run: Sat Feb 17 2024 22:54:10 - 23:22:17
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 23229835.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4767.7 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1923.8 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 266499.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 80212.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 765929.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 490112.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 51440.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 4029.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6329.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1774.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 286408.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 23229835.4 1990.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4767.7 866.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 1923.8 447.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 266499.3 673.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 80212.1 484.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 765929.6 1320.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 490112.2 394.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 51440.9 128.6
Process Creation 126.0 4029.1 319.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6329.9 1492.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1774.5 2957.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 286408.6 190.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 637.9
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Feb 17 2024 23:22:17 - 23:50:32
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 88813860.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 18817.6 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 6169.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 382612.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 128017.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1398950.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1844931.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 313230.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 13467.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 13254.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1812.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 997454.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 88813860.6 7610.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 18817.6 3421.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 6169.7 1434.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 382612.3 966.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 128017.3 773.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1398950.4 2412.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1844931.1 1483.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 313230.4 783.1
Process Creation 126.0 13467.1 1068.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 13254.6 3126.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1812.8 3021.4
System Call Overhead 15000.0 997454.8 665.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1685.3
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Looking Glass
Test IPv4: 64.112.124.13
Test IPv6: 2602:fbdf::2d7:fd78
Download Files: 10MB 100MB 1000MB
Global Node Test
## CDN Speedtest
CacheFly : 46.27 MiB/s | 370.20 Mbps | ping 6.657ms
Gdrive : 7.85 KiB/s | 0.06 Mbps | ping 7.810ms
## North America Speedtest
Softlayer, Washington, USA : 30.01 MiB/s | 240.06 Mbps | ping 35.575ms
SoftLayer, San Jose, USA : 26.15 MiB/s | 209.24 Mbps | ping 48.421ms
SoftLayer, Dallas, USA : 0 B/s | N/A | ping error!
Vultr, New Jersey, USA : 17.20 MiB/s | 137.60 Mbps | ping 35.309ms
Vultr, Seattle, USA : 30.85 MiB/s | 246.84 Mbps | ping 64.496ms
Vultr, Dallas, USA : 42.81 MiB/s | 342.47 Mbps | ping 7.565ms
Vultr, Los Angeles, USA : 0 B/s | N/A | ping 37.879ms
Ramnode, New York, USA : 33.19 MiB/s | 265.55 Mbps | ping 34.854ms
Ramnode, Atlanta, USA : 41.83 MiB/s | 334.62 Mbps | ping 18.843ms
## Europe Speedtest
Vultr, London, UK : 18.62 MiB/s | 148.96 Mbps | ping 108.513ms
LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany : 21.44 KiB/s | 0.17 Mbps | ping 116.676ms
Hetzner, Germany : 289 B/s | N/A | ping 124.030ms
Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL : 19.18 MiB/s | 153.42 Mbps | ping 111.537ms
Vultr, Amsterdam, NL : 15.86 MiB/s | 126.88 Mbps | ping 116.867ms
EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden : 500 B/s | N/A | ping 135.243ms
OVH, Roubaix, France : 347 B/s | N/A | ping 113.744ms
Online, France : 19.02 MiB/s | 152.12 Mbps | ping 107.657ms
Prometeus, Milan, Italy : 358 B/s | N/A | ping 130.589ms
## Exotic Speedtest
Sydney, Australia : 4.46 MiB/s | 35.67 Mbps | ping 257.336ms
Lagoon, New Caledonia : 368 B/s | N/A | ping 263.673ms
Hosteasy, Moldova : 6.24 MiB/s | 49.90 Mbps | ping 150.516ms
Prima, Argentina : 1.14 MiB/s | 9.11 Mbps | ping error!
## Asia Speedtest
SoftLayer, Singapore : 356.35 KiB/s | 2.78 Mbps | ping 231.747ms
Linode, Tokyo, Japan : 114.58 KiB/s | 0.90 Mbps | ping 140.441ms
Linode, Singapore : 7.85 MiB/s | 62.79 Mbps | ping 203.572ms
Vultr, Tokyo, Japan : 12.13 MiB/s | 97.04 Mbps | ping 145.089ms
Benchmark finished in 150 seconds
Global Latency Test
Query: ping 64.112.124.99, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 64.112.124.99 – ARIN /24 AS918 DFDB-NET – United States
Media Unlock Test
** Test Starts At: Sun 18 Feb 2024 01:24:08 AM EST
** Checking Results Under IPv4
--------------------------------
** Your Network Provider: KhanWebHost (64.112.*.*)
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Yes (Region: US)
HotStar: No
Disney+: Yes (Region: US)
Netflix: Yes (Region: US)
YouTube Premium: Yes
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: US)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
iQyi Oversea Region: US
Viu.com: No
YouTube CDN: Dallas, TX
Netflix Preferred CDN: Dallas, TX
Spotify Registration: No
Steam Currency: USD
ChatGPT: Yes
Bing Region: US
Instagram Licensed Audio: Yes
=======================================
** Checking Results Under IPv6
--------------------------------
** Your Network Provider: (:::*:*)
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Failed (Network Connection)
HotStar: Yes (Region: US)
Disney+: Available For [Disney+ PK] Soon
Netflix: Yes (Region: US)
YouTube Premium: Yes
Amazon Prime Video: Unsupported
TVBAnywhere+: Failed (Network Connection)
iQyi Oversea Region: Failed
Viu.com: Failed
YouTube CDN: Dallas, TX
Netflix Preferred CDN: San Jose, CA
Spotify Registration: No
Steam Currency: Failed (Network Connection)
ChatGPT: Failed
Bing Region: US
Instagram Licensed Audio: No
=======================================
Testing Done! CloudFlare Internet Test
PageSpeed Insights
GTmetrix Performance
Admin Control Panel
KhanWebHost’s KVM VPS also comes with a user-friendly dashboard. This allows users to easily manage their hosting environment, including system reinstallation and viewing logs and graphs. This ease of use is a significant advantage for beginners and experienced users.
Server Pricing
Official Website: https://www.KhanWebHost.com
Payments
KhanWebHost offers a variety of payment options to cater to the diverse needs of its customers. They accept payments through Credit / Debit / Prepaid Cards, PayPal, and Wire Transfer. This flexibility in payment methods makes it convenient for customers from different regions and with different preferences to use their services.
Transparency in billing is one of the key features of KhanWebHost. They provide clear and detailed invoices, ensuring customers understand what they are paying for. Users appreciate this transparency, which helps avoid confusion or misunderstandings regarding the charges.
Coupon
The merchant did not provide
Customer Support
KhanWebHost’s tech support is another highlight. The support team is knowledgeable and responsive, ensuring a smooth user experience. This level of support can be crucial, especially for users who may not have extensive technical knowledge. Many users have praised the quick response times and friendly support.
Conclusion
Our testing revealed an average I/O speed of approximately 251.7 MB/s, positioning it in the “good” performance bracket, although it’s on the cusp of what would be considered “excellent.” Network assessments through various global locations showed varying upload and download speeds, notable for their high throughput in most regions except for significantly lower speeds in China, likely due to the greater internet restrictions. The Yabs performance benchmarks further underscored the server’s robust disk and read/write capabilities with mixed operations reaching up to nearly 600 MB/s, which is impressive.
Geekbench 6 offered insights into the CPU’s prowess, recording a single-core score of 565 and a multi-core score of 1860. These results firmly plant the CPU’s performance in the “good” category, demonstrating it has ample power for most tasks. The UnixBench scores further echoed the CPU’s efficiency and multitasking strength, particularly when running multiple tests in parallel, showcasing a system that performs well under pressure.
In conclusion, the KhanWebHost Texas VPS server is a robust hosting solution, ideal for businesses looking for a balanced blend of speed, reliability, and network performance. Its solid I/O speed, excellent network capabilities, and strong CPU performance make it a compelling choice for many web hosting needs. Whether for a high-traffic website, an e-commerce platform, or an online application, this server is up to the challenge, offering impressive performance that should satisfy most hosting requirements.
Official Website: https://www.KhanWebHost.com
Related Posts
