TensorDock United States Joplin AMD EPYC 7352 Cloud Virtual Machine Test and Review
We recently tested the TensorDock United States Joplin Cloud Virtual Machine, a server powered by an AMD EPYC 7352 24-core Processor. The configuration included 2 CPU cores, 8 GB of RAM, 20 GB of SSD storage, a 10 Gbps internet port, and 1 IPv4 address.
About TensorDock
TensorDock is a cloud computing platform that provides affordable and powerful CPU and GPU servers for AI and machine learning workloads. It aims to challenge traditional hyperscalers by offering a global fleet of GPU servers at significantly lower costs. With a focus on simplicity and transparency, TensorDock eliminates quotas, hidden fees, and price gouging, allowing developers to focus on building their products rather than worrying about infrastructure.
Official Website: https://www.TensorDock.com
Basic Information
Processor : AMD EPYC 7352 24-Core Processor
CPU Numbers : 2
CPU Frequency : 2299.852 MHz
CPU Cache : L1: 128.00 KB / L2: 1.00 MB / L3: 16.00 MB
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 404.40 MiB / 7.75 GiB
Swap : [ no swap partition or swap file detected ]
Disk Space : 3.97 GiB / 19.20 GiB
Boot Disk : /dev/vda1
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 10 min
Loads : 0.62, 0.30, 0.20
OS Release : Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS (x86_64)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel Version : 5.15.0-125-generic
TCP Acceleration : bbr
VM Type : QEMU
NAT Type : Port Restricted Cone
IPV4 ASN : AS62943 Bluebird Network
IPV4 Location : Columbia / Missouri / US
GB6 Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 924
Multi Core | 1575
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9909125
YABS completed in 9 min 46 sec
RAM Read/Write Tests
----------------------------Memory-Test---------------------------------
-> Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
Single Read Test: 24147.88 MB/s
Single Write Test: 12674.05 MB/s
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: read
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 798045 (79791.39 per second)
779.34 MiB transferred (77.92 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0002s
total number of events: 798045
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 0.53
95th percentile: 0.01
sum: 3318.32
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 798045.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 3.3183/0.00
Running memory speed test with the following options:
block size: 1KiB
total size: 102400MiB
operation: write
scope: global
Initializing worker threads...
Threads started!
Total operations: 786955 (78683.89 per second)
768.51 MiB transferred (76.84 MiB/sec)
General statistics:
total time: 10.0002s
total number of events: 786955
Latency (ms):
min: 0.00
avg: 0.00
max: 1.61
95th percentile: 0.01
sum: 3334.61
Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev): 786955.0000/0.00
execution time (avg/stddev): 3.3346/0.00
Disk Read/Write Tests
------------------------Disk-dd-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
-> Disk test in progress (4K Block/1M Block, Direct Mode)
Block Size Write Test Read Test
100MB-4K Block 24.1 MB/s (5879 IOPS, 4.35s) 30.9 MB/s (7545 IOPS, 3.39s)
1GB-1M Block 392 MB/s (374 IOPS, 2.68s) 2.1 GB/s (2000 IOPS, 0.50s)
-----------------------Disk-fio-Read/Write-Test-------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 48.31 MB/s (12.0k) | 680.21 MB/s (10.6k)
Write | 48.38 MB/s (12.0k) | 683.79 MB/s (10.6k)
Total | 96.69 MB/s (24.1k) | 1.36 GB/s (21.3k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 1.03 GB/s (2.0k) | 1.43 GB/s (1.3k)
Write | 1.08 GB/s (2.1k) | 1.52 GB/s (1.4k)
Total | 2.11 GB/s (4.1k) | 2.95 GB/s (2.8k)
Iperf3 Network Tests
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 2.01 Gbits/sec | 2.22 Gbits/sec | 90.7 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 7.87 Gbits/sec | 6.54 Gbits/sec | 97.0 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 2.29 Gbits/sec | 2.69 Gbits/sec | 202 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 2.49 Gbits/sec | 3.55 Gbits/sec | 289 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 2.85 Gbits/sec | 3.69 Gbits/sec | 59.7 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 8.64 Gbits/sec | 6.77 Gbits/sec | 24.4 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 495 Mbits/sec | 3.80 Gbits/sec | 214 ms UnixBench Tests
Benchmark Run: Mon Jan 13 2025 00:38:57 - 01:06:57
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 32021201.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 5579.3 MWIPS (9.6 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3418.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 878678.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 258964.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2080920.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1401680.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 19715.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 4487.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7864.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1625.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1545833.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 32021201.5 2743.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5579.3 1014.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 3418.5 795.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 878678.0 2218.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 258964.6 1564.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2080920.5 3587.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1401680.3 1126.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 19715.5 49.3
Process Creation 126.0 4487.6 356.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7864.9 1854.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1625.2 2708.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1545833.2 1030.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1090.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Jan 13 2025 01:06:57 - 01:35:01
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 73385106.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 12060.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4994.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1087406.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 323668.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2192662.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 3072019.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 361306.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 13121.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 12717.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1690.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2432882.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 73385106.4 6288.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 12060.8 2192.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 4994.9 1161.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1087406.1 2746.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 323668.3 1955.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2192662.9 3780.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3072019.0 2469.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 361306.4 903.3
Process Creation 126.0 13121.1 1041.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 12717.6 2999.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1690.6 2817.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2432882.6 1621.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2160.7
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
Streaming Unlock Tests
============[ Multination ]============
Dazn: Yes (Region: US)
Disney+: Yes (Region: US)
Netflix: Yes (Region: US)
YouTube Premium: Yes (Region: US)
Amazon Prime Video: Yes (Region: US)
TVBAnywhere+: Yes
Spotify Registration: Yes (Region: US)
OneTrust Region: US [Missouri]
iQyi Oversea Region: US
Bing Region: US
YouTube CDN: [SOUTHFRONT] in [Moline, IL]
Netflix Preferred CDN: [Bluebird Network] in [Kansas City, MO]
ChatGPT: Yes
Google Gemini: Yes (Region: USA)
Wikipedia Editability: No
Google Play Store: United States
Google Search CAPTCHA Free: Yes
Steam Currency: USD
---Forum---
Reddit: Yes
=======================================
IP Quality Detection
Data for reference only, does not represent 100% accurate, if and the actual situation is not consistent with the manual query multiple database comparison
The following is the number of each database, the output will come with the corresponding number of the database source
ipinfo databases [0] | scamalytics databases [1] | virustotal databases [2] | abuseipdb databases [3] | ip2location databases [4]
ip-api databases [5] | ipwhois databases [6] | ipregistry databases [7] | ipdata databases [8] | db-ip databases [9]
ipapiis databases [A] | ipapicom databases [B] | bigdatacloud databases [C] | cheervision databases [D] | ipqualityscore databases [E]
IPV4:
Security Score:
Reputation: 0 [2]
TrustScore: 30 [8]
VpnScore: 85 [8]
ProxyScore: 30 [8]
CommunityVoteHarmless: 0 [2]
CommunityVoteMalicious: 0 [2]
ThreatScore: 96 [8]
FraudScore: 0 [1 E]
AbuseScore: 0 [3]
ASNAbuseScore: 0.0001 (Very Low) [A]
CompannyAbuseScore: 0.0005 (Very Low) [A]
ThreatLevel: low [9 B]
Blacklist_Records_Statistics(how many blacklisted websites have records):
HarmlessnessRecords: 0 [2] MaliciousRecords: 0 [2] SuspiciousRecords: 0 [2] NoRecords: 94 [2]
Security Info:
UsageType: corporate [9] FixedLineISP [3] business [8] isp [0 7 A] unknown [C]
CompanyType: isp [0 7 A]
IsCloudProvider: No [7 D]
IsDatacenter: Yes [0] No [1 5 6 8 A C]
IsMobile: No [5 A C] Yes [E]
IsProxy: No [0 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E]
IsVpn: No [0 1 6 7 A C D E]
IsTor: No [0 1 3 6 7 8 A B C D E]
IsTorExit: No [1 7 D]
IsCrawler: No [9 A B E]
IsAnonymous: No [1 6 7 8 D]
IsAttacker: No [7 8 D]
IsAbuser: No [7 8 A C D E]
IsThreat: No [7 8 C D]
IsRelay: No [0 7 8 C D]
IsBogon: No [7 8 A C D]
IsBot: No [E]
DNS-BlackList: 314(Total_Check) 0(Clean) 8(Blacklisted) 16(Other)
Google search feasibility: YES
Email Port Detection
Platform SMTP SMTPS POP3 POP3S IMAP IMAPS
LocalPort ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
QQ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
163 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sohu ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yandex ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Gmail ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Outlook ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Office365 ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Yahoo ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
MailCOM ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
MailRU ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✘
AOL ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
GMX ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Sina ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘ Looking Glass
None
Global Latency Tests
Query: ping 69.55.141.244, interval: 5s, dense mode: no
Probing 69.55.141.244 – /24 AS62943 AS62943-BLUEBIRD-N – United States, Missouri, Springfield [residential]
CloudFlare Internet Tests
None
PageSpeed Insights
None
GTmetrix Performance
None
Admin Control Panel
Server Pricing
Official Website: https://www.TensorDock.com
Coupon
The merchant did not provide
Conclusion
The server ran on Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS with a 5.15.0-125-generic kernel and utilized TCP acceleration via bbr. The machine showed solid performance in single-core and multi-core tasks, scoring 924 and 1575 in the Geekbench 6 benchmark. The RAM tests revealed impressive speeds, with 24,147.88 MB/s read and 12,674.05 MB/s write, indicating efficient memory handling.
The disk performance was equally strong, with 4K block write speeds of 24.1 MB/s and 1M block read speeds reaching 2.1 GB/s. The fio tests further confirmed the SSD’s capability, with 4K read/write speeds of 48.31 MB/s and 48.38 MB/s, scaling up to 1.36 GB/s for 64K blocks. These results highlight the server’s ability to handle both small and large file operations effectively. The Iperf3 network tests demonstrated excellent connectivity, with speeds reaching 8.64 Gbits/sec in NYC and 7.87 Gbits/sec in Amsterdam, showcasing the server’s robust 10 Gbps port performance.
The server also excelled in streaming unlock tests, supporting platforms like Netflix, Disney+, and YouTube Premium with a US region lock. It passed IP quality detection with a low threat level and no significant blacklist records, making it suitable for corporate or business use. The email port detection confirmed compatibility with major email providers, including Gmail, Outlook, and Yahoo, ensuring seamless integration for email-related applications.
In conclusion, the TensorDock Joplin Cloud Virtual Machine delivers reliable performance across CPU, memory, disk, and network benchmarks. Its strong streaming unlocks capabilities and low threat score make it a solid choice for businesses or developers needing a US-based server. Whether for hosting, streaming, or general-purpose computing, this machine offers a well-rounded solution with impressive speed and stability.
Official Website: https://www.TensorDock.com
Related Posts
