Evoxt Japan Osaka High CPU Frequency Virtual Machine Test and Review

Evoxt Japan Osaka High CPU Frequency Virtual Machine Test and Review

We tried out Evoxt‘s High-Performance VPS Hosting in Osaka, Japan. This server runs on a modern virtual processor with 2 CPU cores, 4 GB of memory, 30 GB of fast SSD storage, 1 Gbps internet connection, 1 TB of data traffic, and both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.

Our team ran a series of simple tests. We used Basic Benchmark, Yabs, and Unix Benchmark to check the key server stats. We did the Global Node Test to look into network quality and checked how quickly it responded to the Global Ping Test.

The Media Unlock Test ensures it can stream media from different regions. Connection quality was tested with the CloudFlare Internet Test, and to see how well it could handle websites, we used PageSpeed Insights and GTmetrix Performance tests.

About Evoxt

Evoxt is a leading provider of high-frequency virtual machines at competitive prices. They offer industry-leading single-core CPU performance with a base CPU clock of 3.5 GHz or more. This high performance and low prices make Evoxt an attractive option for those seeking powerful yet affordable virtual machines.

Evoxt’s virtual machines are designed to save time and effort managing your virtual machines. They offer a virtual machine control panel that allows you to collect and monitor your virtual machines’ information, status, and performance. The interface is intuitive and easy to use, eliminating the need for unnecessary fiddling.

Security is a top priority for Evoxt. They provide multiple layers of enterprise-level security to protect your server. This includes an isolated virtual machine environment to prevent unauthorized access to your server. They also offer an enterprise-level layer 3 security firewall that you can easily tweak and set up with a few clicks. In addition, Evoxt provides automatic backups of your server’s data to secure your server further.

Evoxt’s virtual machines are available globally, with high CPU frequency virtual machines from six countries worldwide. They also offer 99.99% uptime, weekly automatic offsite backup, scalability, privacy protection, enterprise-grade hardware, and speedy deployment. They also accept major cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Ethereum.

Official Website: https://www.Evoxt.com

BasicBench: Server Profile, I/O Speed, Upload and Download Speed

 CPU Model          : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
 CPU Cores          : 2 @ 4199.980 MHz
 CPU Cache          : 512 KB
 AES-NI             : ✗ Disabled
 VM-x/AMD-V         : ✗ Disabled
 Total Disk         : 29.8 GB (1.5 GB Used)
 Total Mem          : 3.8 GB (65.5 MB Used)
 System uptime      : 1 days, 21 hour 18 min
 Load average       : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
 OS                 : Debian GNU/Linux 11
 Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel             : 5.10.0-8-amd64
 TCP CC             : cubic
 Virtualization     : KVM
 IPv4/IPv6          : ✓ Online / ✓ Online
 Organization       : AS149440 Evoxt Enterprise
 Location           : Osaka / JP
 Region             : Ōsaka
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 I/O Speed(1st run) : 950 MB/s
 I/O Speed(2nd run) : 2.4 GB/s
 I/O Speed(3rd run) : 2.6 GB/s
 I/O Speed(average) : 2023.3 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Node Name        Upload Speed      Download Speed      Latency     
 Speedtest.net    842.04 Mbps       822.04 Mbps         7.41 ms     
 Los Angeles, US  732.08 Mbps       570.56 Mbps         110.82 ms   
 Dallas, US       530.64 Mbps       546.50 Mbps         137.33 ms   
 Montreal, CA     245.69 Mbps       918.32 Mbps         172.62 ms   
 Paris, FR        348.53 Mbps       826.27 Mbps         250.87 ms   
 Amsterdam, NL    228.28 Mbps       354.50 Mbps         238.82 ms   
 Shanghai, CN     806.05 Mbps       690.21 Mbps         50.02 ms    
 Hongkong, CN     817.40 Mbps       637.26 Mbps         57.24 ms    
 Mumbai, IN       342.40 Mbps       533.15 Mbps         255.17 ms   
 Singapore, SG    759.00 Mbps       926.61 Mbps         85.38 ms    
 Tokyo, JP        820.62 Mbps       841.98 Mbps         7.96 ms     
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Finished in        : 5 min 29 sec
 Timestamp          : 2023-12-21 22:41:53 EST

YabsBench: Disk Speed, iperf3 Network Speed, Geekbench 6 Benchmark

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 1 days, 21 hours, 28 minutes
Processor  : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
CPU cores  : 2 @ 4199.980 MHz
AES-NI     : ❌ Disabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM        : 3.8 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 29.8 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Kernel     : 5.10.0-8-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Evoxt Enterprise
ASN        : Unknown
Host       : Evoxt Enterprise
Location   : Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur (14)
Country    : Malaysia

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 622.40 MB/s (155.6k) | 2.03 GB/s    (31.8k)
Write      | 624.04 MB/s (156.0k) | 2.04 GB/s    (32.0k)
Total      | 1.24 GB/s   (311.6k) | 4.08 GB/s    (63.8k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 2.36 GB/s     (4.6k) | 2.30 GB/s     (2.2k)
Write      | 2.48 GB/s     (4.8k) | 2.46 GB/s     (2.4k)
Total      | 4.84 GB/s     (9.4k) | 4.77 GB/s     (4.6k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 493 Mbits/sec   | 180 Mbits/sec   | 241 ms         
Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | busy            | busy            | 257 ms         
NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 493 Mbits/sec   | 456 Mbits/sec   | 243 ms         
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 459 Mbits/sec   | 211 Mbits/sec   | 335 ms         
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 527 Mbits/sec   | 188 Mbits/sec   | 164 ms         
Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 527 Mbits/sec   | 209 Mbits/sec   | 148 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 667 Mbits/sec   | 366 Mbits/sec   | 123 ms         

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 406 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 241 ms         
Scaleway        | Paris, FR (10G)           | busy            | busy            | 248 ms         
NovoServe       | North Holland, NL (40G)   | 522 Mbits/sec   | 413 Mbits/sec   | 243 ms         
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 373 Mbits/sec   | 163 Mbits/sec   | 332 ms         
Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 266 Mbits/sec   | 119 Mbits/sec   | 164 ms         
Clouvider       | Dallas, TX, US (10G)      | 616 Mbits/sec   | 298 Mbits/sec   | 146 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 642 Mbits/sec   | 417 Mbits/sec   | 122 ms         

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 1187                          
Multi Core      | 2028                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/4088485

YABS completed in 18 min 6 sec

UnixBench: CPU Performance, A Score Higher is Better

Benchmark Run: Fri Dec 22 2023 01:11:10 - 01:39:02
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       70157490.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    10403.1 MWIPS (9.6 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                              10412.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       2240934.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          622748.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       6307885.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             3988006.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 191374.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              17508.6 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  20583.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   3501.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        4182268.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   70157490.2   6011.8
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      10403.1   1891.5
Execl Throughput                                 43.0      10412.5   2421.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    2240934.0   5658.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     622748.8   3762.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    6307885.2  10875.7
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    3988006.1   3205.8
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     191374.4    478.4
Process Creation                                126.0      17508.6   1389.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      20583.6   4854.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       3501.0   5835.1
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    4182268.0   2788.2
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        3181.0

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Dec 22 2023 01:39:02 - 02:06:56
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables      139127473.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    20942.6 MWIPS (9.6 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                              12874.6 lps   (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1169827.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          509276.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       3570166.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             7929988.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 915790.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              43437.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  26520.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   3763.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        4090108.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0  139127473.0  11921.8
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      20942.6   3807.8
Execl Throughput                                 43.0      12874.6   2994.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1169827.0   2954.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     509276.9   3077.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    3570166.9   6155.5
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    7929988.1   6374.6
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     915790.4   2289.5
Process Creation                                126.0      43437.1   3447.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      26520.0   6254.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       3763.6   6272.6
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    4090108.8   2726.7
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        4308.7

======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= 

Looking Glass

None

Global Node Test

 ## CDN Speedtest

 CacheFly :  21.68 MiB/s |  173.44 Mbps  | ping 105.887ms
 Gdrive   :       0 B/s |      N/A       | ping 249.060ms


 ## North America Speedtest

 Softlayer, Washington, USA : 774.61 KiB/s |    6.05 Mbps  | ping 168.194ms
 SoftLayer, San Jose, USA   :   3.30 MiB/s |   26.37 Mbps  | ping 112.489ms
 SoftLayer, Dallas, USA     :       0 B/s |      N/A       | ping error!
 Vultr, New Jersey, USA     : 267.58 KiB/s |    2.09 Mbps  | ping 182.950ms
 Vultr, Seattle, USA        :  14.74 MiB/s |  117.95 Mbps  | ping 130.263ms
 Vultr, Dallas, USA         :  14.95 MiB/s |  119.59 Mbps  | ping 142.369ms
 Vultr, Los Angeles, USA    :  20.74 MiB/s |  165.95 Mbps  | ping 105.318ms
 Ramnode, New York, USA     :   6.69 MiB/s |   53.49 Mbps  | ping 162.871ms
 Ramnode, Atlanta, USA      :  13.17 MiB/s |  105.34 Mbps  | ping 152.705ms


 ## Europe Speedtest

 Vultr, London, UK            :   5.52 MiB/s |   44.15 Mbps  | ping 241.453ms
 LeaseWeb, Frankfurt, Germany :  17.09 KiB/s |    0.13 Mbps  | ping 311.319ms
 Hetzner, Germany             :     186 B/s |      N/A       | ping 250.878ms
 Ramnode, Alblasserdam, NL    :   6.07 MiB/s |   48.58 Mbps  | ping 255.611ms
 Vultr, Amsterdam, NL         :   5.22 MiB/s |   41.78 Mbps  | ping 240.407ms
 EDIS, Stockholm, Sweden      :     320 B/s |      N/A       | ping 269.222ms
 OVH, Roubaix, France         :     319 B/s |      N/A       | ping 242.959ms
 Online, France               :   2.05 MiB/s |   16.38 Mbps  | ping 257.209ms
 Prometeus, Milan, Italy      :     279 B/s |      N/A       | ping 261.030ms


 ## Exotic Speedtest

 Sydney, Australia     :   8.15 MiB/s |   65.20 Mbps  | ping 188.916ms
 Lagoon, New Caledonia :     308 B/s |      N/A       | ping 187.086ms
 Hosteasy, Moldova     :   1.34 MiB/s |   10.72 Mbps  | ping 256.646ms
 Prima, Argentina      : 179.21 KiB/s |    1.40 Mbps  | ping error!


 ## Asia Speedtest

 SoftLayer, Singapore :   7.78 MiB/s |   62.27 Mbps  | ping  87.290ms
 Linode, Tokyo, Japan :  54.26 MiB/s |  434.07 Mbps  | ping  10.681ms
 Linode, Singapore    :  18.38 MiB/s |  147.07 Mbps  | ping  76.815ms
 Vultr, Tokyo, Japan  : 103.73 MiB/s |  829.88 Mbps  | ping   8.502ms


 Benchmark finished in 104 seconds

Global Latency Test

Evoxt Japan Osaka High CPU Frequency Virtual Machine Test and Review Evoxt Japan Osaka High CPU Frequency Virtual Machine Test and Review

Query: ping 136.0.11.66, interval: 5s, dense mode: no

Probing 136.0.11.66 – ARIN /20 AS60311 ONEFM – Japan, Ōsaka, Osaka

Media Unlock Test

 ** Test Starts At: Fri 22 Dec 2023 12:30:43 AM EST

 ** Checking Results Under IPv4 
--------------------------------
 ** Your Network Provider: Evoxt Enterprise (136.0.*.*) 

============[ Multination ]============
 Dazn:                                  Yes (Region: JP)
 HotStar:                               No
 Disney+:                               No
 Netflix:                               Originals Only
 YouTube Premium:                       Yes (Region: JP)
 Amazon Prime Video:                    Yes (Region: JP)
 TVBAnywhere+:                          Yes
 iQyi Oversea Region:                   INTL
 Viu.com:                               No
 YouTube CDN:                           Osaka 
 Netflix Preferred CDN:                 Osaka  
 Spotify Registration:                  No
 Steam Currency:                        JPY
 ChatGPT:                               Yes
 Bing Region:                           JP
=======================================


 ** Checking Results Under IPv6 
--------------------------------
 ** Your Network Provider:  (2400:8d60:8:*:*) 

============[ Multination ]============
 Dazn:                                  Failed (Network Connection)
 HotStar:                               Yes (Region: MY)
 Disney+:                               Available For [Disney+ MY] Soon
 Netflix:                               Yes (Region: MY)
 YouTube Premium:                       Yes (Region: MY)
 Amazon Prime Video:                    Unsupported
 TVBAnywhere+:                          Failed (Network Connection)
 iQyi Oversea Region:                   Failed
 Viu.com:                               Failed
 YouTube CDN:                           Tokyo 
 Netflix Preferred CDN:                 Osaka  
 Spotify Registration:                  No
 Steam Currency:                        Failed (Network Connection)
 ChatGPT:                               Failed
 Bing Region:                           MY
=======================================
Testing Done! 

CloudFlare Internet Test

Evoxt Japan Osaka High CPU Frequency Virtual Machine Test and Review

PageSpeed Insights

Evoxt Japan Osaka High CPU Frequency Virtual Machine Test and Review

GTmetrix Performance

Evoxt Japan Osaka High CPU Frequency Virtual Machine Test and Review

Get Started with Evoxt Virtual Machines

Evoxt Japan Osaka High CPU Frequency Virtual Machine Test and Review

Create an Account: The first step is to create an account with Evoxt. This will give you access to the dashboard to manage your virtual machines.

Choose a Plan: Evoxt offers many plans to suit different needs. You can choose a plan that best fits your requirements.

Deploy a Virtual Machine: Once you’ve chosen a plan, you can deploy a virtual machine. This process is quick and easy, and your virtual machine will be ready to use within a few minutes.

Choose an Operating System: Evoxt offers a wide selection of operating systems. Choose the one that you want to work on.

Manage Your Virtual Machine: Evoxt provides a virtual machine control panel that allows you to collect and monitor your virtual machines’ information, status, and performance. You can also manage IPs and create sub-accounts.

Evoxt’s infrastructure includes automatic weekly backups, so your data is always secure. If you need further assistance, you can check out the guides provided by Evoxt1 or contact their support team.

Admin Control Panel

Evoxt Japan Osaka High CPU Frequency Virtual Machine Test and Review

Evoxt’s Admin Control Dashboard is a powerful tool that allows you to manage your virtual machines easily. Here are some of its key features:

  • Monitoring: The dashboard allows you to collect and monitor your virtual machines’ information, status, and performance. This helps you keep track of your resources and optimize them as needed.
  • IP Management: The dashboard provides an IP management feature that allows you to easily swap and reassign IP addresses between servers.
  • Sub Accounts: You can create sub-accounts, which can be useful if you have a team working on different projects or want to delegate certain tasks.
  • Intuitive Interface: The dashboard has an intuitive and easy-to-use interface. This saves you time as you don’t have to fiddle to find the needed features.
  • Security: The dashboard is part of Evoxt’s multiple layers of enterprise-level security. This ensures that your server and data are protected.

In summary, Evoxt’s Admin Control Dashboard is designed to make managing your virtual machines a breeze. It offers a range of features that save time, enhance security, and provide flexibility.

Server Pricing

Evoxt Japan Osaka High CPU Frequency Virtual Machine Test and Review

Evoxt offers a wide range of plans to suit different needs. Their plans range from the VM-0.5 plan, which offers 1 core (3.5+ GHz), 512 MB RAM, 5 GB storage, and 500 GB monthly transfer for $2.99 per month, to the VM-16 plan, which offers 16 cores (3.5+ GHz), 32 GB RAM, 100 GB storage, and 10 TB monthly transfer for $95.99 per month. All their plans come with weekly backups.

Official Website: https://www.Evoxt.com

Coupon

The merchant did not provide

Payments

Evoxt Japan Osaka High CPU Frequency Virtual Machine Test and Review

Evoxt provides various payment options and flexible billing plans, making it easy to manage your payments and keep track of your expenses.

Payment Methods: Evoxt accepts various payment methods, including Credit Cards, Debit Cards, PayPal, Bitcoin, and USDt Tron.

Flexible Plans: Evoxt offers monthly billing plans for up to 3 years. This lets you choose a plan that best suits your budget and needs.

Transparent Pricing: Evoxt believes in transparent pricing. If you order a $2.99 plan, you will pay $2.99. They don’t charge any extra bandwidth fees or any CPU burst fees.

Account Credits: You can top up funds into your Evoxt account credits. The system will automatically apply these credits to any new invoices generated.

Automatic Payments: Evoxt uses account credits to perform automatic payments. You can switch on automatic renewal in the Evoxt dashboard to enable automatic payments. When Automatic renewal is turned on, Evoxt’s billing system will automatically charge your Evoxt account credits when your services are near the due date.

Customer Support

Evoxt Japan Osaka High CPU Frequency Virtual Machine Test and Review

Evoxt’s customer support is designed to be accessible, responsive, and user-friendly, ensuring that users get the help they need when they need it.

Support Channels: Evoxt offers multiple support channels. They have a Telegram channel and a Discord contact where users can seek help quickly and easily. Alternatively, users can open a support ticket to contact the support team.

Response Time: Evoxt’s support team is responsive and prioritizes tickets based on their level of urgency. This ensures that critical issues are addressed promptly.

Bug Reports: Users can report bugs through support tickets. The Evoxt team takes these reports seriously and works diligently to resolve any issues.

Ease of Use: Evoxt understands that ticketing and emailing can be troublesome, so they provide support via Discord and Telegram for quick and easy communication.

Conclusion

In our Basic Bench test for speed, the server showed impressive input/output (I/O) speeds, peaking on the third run with a blazing 2.6 GB/s. The average I/O speed rounded up to an efficient 2023.3 MB/s. These speeds matter because they tell us how quickly the server can read and write data.

Our network checks across various global nodes revealed that Tokyo and Osaka had the top upload and download speeds and, understandably, the lowest latency. This means the server is quick and responsive, especially within its local region.

The Yabs Performance Bench painted an equally rosy picture, showing high disk speeds for reading and writing data. With figures like 1.24 GB/s for smaller blocks and up to 4.77 GB/s for larger ones, it’s clear the disk setup is robust.

For the Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test, the server scored well on single-core and multi-core performance, indicating it can handle individual tasks quickly and manage multiple processes effectively simultaneously. The UnixBench scores only confirmed the server’s strong CPU performance, with its system benchmarks index score reaching a high 4308.7 when both CPUs were fired up.

The tests conclude with a Media Unlock Test, which checks if the server can access different media services from its location. It successfully accessed multiple services as a Japan-based server, like Dazn, YouTube Premium, and Amazon Prime Video. Still, notedly, it didn’t work for others like Netflix Full Library, Disney+, and HotStar.

In conclusion, the Evoxt VPS in Osaka shines with high-speed and reliable performance, especially for tasks requiring rapid data processing and serving local content quickly. High network speeds and low latency are ideal for swift data transfer operations.

At the same time, the mixed results on the Media Unlock Test suggest that while the server is fit for regional content delivery, it might need additional configurations for broader international media access. It’s a strong choice if you’re targeting the Asian market, especially Japan.

Official Website: https://www.Evoxt.com

Related Posts